메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제12권 제2호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
211 - 230 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Henry Fielding's The Life of Mr. Jonathan Wild the Great (first published in 1743) is essentially a farce (in the form of a burlesque criminal narrative), a transitional work from Fielding's theatrical farces in the 1730s to the comic prose fiction in the 1740s. Often underestimated, ‘farce' is the quintessential mode in which Fielding perceives and represents both the world and his own authorship. This thesis proposes to analyse Fielding's farcical rendering of Wild in comparison with Charlie Chaplin's of Hitler in The Great Dictator(1940) and present an interpretation of the quizzical ending of Jonathan Wild. Chaplin's impersonation of Adolf Hitler as Hynkel in The Great Dictator is a classic case of farcical acting, which centers on the actor or farceur's body. The farceur has his/her body exposed to incessant violence and somehow survives it unscathed, only to repeat everything da capo. Similarly, Fielding's Wild is a farceur subjected to a series of fiascos as gang boss and as lover. Still, he survives all his farcical mortifications, like Chaplin's Little Tramp or Tom the cat in Tom and Jerry, and the ending of Jonathan Wild proves that even the gallows cannot really finish him off. Far from repenting his crimes, Wild pilfers a bottle screw from the Ordinary of Newgate's pocket before hanging, as if in defiance of death itself as well as the rule of the law and the church embodied in the Ordinary. Farce in Jonathan Wild paradoxically vests indestructibility in Wild the farceur and ends up with the unabated threat of evil.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0