메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국제임스조이스학회 제임스조이스 저널 제임스조이스 저널 제10권 제2호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
211 - 230 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Joyce's concept of “nat language” as not language has been understood as his way of interrogating language per se. But nothing can be politically neutral, considering the fact that Finnegans Wake was written during the Irish Civil War and then the implementation of a free state. Furthermore, Joyce's last work is permeated by so many Irish historical events that we cannot discuss it without referring to them. One of the important historical events is the Gaelic League, an organization that led the bandwagon of Irish cultural nationalism. As an Irish writer and a colonized subject of the British Empire, however, Joyce must have inevitably been ridden by the controversial agenda of reviving the “native” language, and have found it difficult to keep totally aloof from the debate. In the post-colonial era, many newly independent nations made efforts to revive their own languages and at least to make them “official” languages. Ireland also officialized the Irish language with English with the advent of a new nation in 1921. Throughout his career as a writer, Joyce never forgot the significance of language in constructing a national or racial identity. Such a belief leads him to incessantly interrogate the efficacy of language as a communicative means within the national conflict of building a new free state. By dismantling the binarism of “native” language, Joyce seems to admit that his “acquired” language is unavoidable. Although his English is “secondmouth language,” it is also “nat language,” a language acquired in the historical moments where he is fatalistically positioned. Finnegans Wake is a result of Joyce's guerilla war against both his “native” language and “nat language” by multiplying or confusing the “origins.” It could be an answer to those writers whose colonial experience always pits them against their obligation for using their “native tongues,” not colonizer's language.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0