메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제30권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
152 - 173 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
German law of residence-ownership have an effect on Korean and Japan law of it. But, they are different an another, and have a distinct characteristic. The collective building management rule is a means of decision-making. Management association makes it independently. It is a rule and a basic order of an organization to form a community. It is made by 'contracts' and 'resolutions' of divided owners. It has a special legal effect to transcend a contract that generates a credit. In other words, It is a supreme autonomic norms of divided owners-community. It is created, revised and abolished by agreement of three-fourths of divided owners. It contains important items to have to do with a ownership. A common sector on rules is what is turned by rule. It is occurred by authentic document and assembly-resolution of divided owners, and occurred by a declaration of intention and a rule in German. On French law a partitioned ownership-rule is a contract that is established by an agreement of divided owners. The standard apartment management rule is made use of normative reference by divided owners, when they make an apartment management rule. It can prevents a dispute, and promotes a harmony among divided owners. I think The Collective Building Management Rule of Korea has to be brought about an improvement. I hope that this paper help improve it.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0