메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
9 - 27 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the U.S., securitization of residential home loans have dramatically changed the operation of the home mortgage market. The recent turmoil in the home mortgage market has enlivened discussion of the assignee liability of the owners of home mortgage loans, arising from the activities of the originators of home mortgage loans. One topic in these discussion is the holder in due course rule. Under Article sec. 3-302 of the Uniform Commercial Code (hereinafter "UCC"), this rule insulates some assignees from borrowers' claims and defenses to payment. Generally speaking, under the UCC, a holder in due course is a person who acquires a home mortgage note for value, in good faith, without notice that it is overdue, dishonored,or that any person has any claim or defense. The holder is protected by the UCC from most claims and defenses that mortgage borrowers can assert to avoid paying on the promissory note. Through this protection of the holder in due course rule, however, predatory lenders have been able to avoid the risk of harm created by those lenders and investors in the securitization market have been able to assign almost all such risk to the homeowners who are the victims of the predatory lenders's practices. This article tries to understand how predatory mortgage lending has become so rampant in the U.S. and to find suggestions for Korean lending industry and relevant legal regimes regarding the holder in due course rule.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0