메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국18세기영문학회 18세기영문학 18세기영문학 제14권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
1 - 28 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Mainstream critics have celebrated Prometheus Unbound as a story in which Shelley’s hero succeeded in removing his antipathy against Jupiter and loving his enemy through the love praised by Asia in Act II. In support of their argument, they interpret as the meaning of ‘revoke’ the word ‘recall’ claimed by Prometheus when he wanted to hear again how he cursed Jupiter. If Shelley had written this play to promote love, then why would he have written The Cenci, composed in the same period, where Beatrice did not show any love but hatred toward his father and killed him? Besides, this view contradicts the poet who rebelled against any kind of tyranny. This essay shows that necessitarianism is the moral principle that Shelley manifests in Prometheus Unbound as well as in The Cenci. He argues that a necessitarian does not harbor hatred and contempt, nor takes a revenge against enemy because human beings do not possess free will but behave by necessity of circumstances. This explains why Prometheus said that he does not hate and disdain Jupiter, nor does he want him to suffer. In contrast, Beatrice, who is not a necessitarian, wants his father to suffer the same pain as she did. It is by necessity, not love that Jupiter was dethroned but not revenged. The necessitarian view will make this poem more appealing to the post-modern readers, who are familiar with mechanistic theories.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0