메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한치매학회 Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지) Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지) 제9권 제4호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
129 - 135 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: It is well known that the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a representative test to evaluate executive function. Neuropsychological studies suggest that patients with frontal lobe damage perform worse on the WCST than do patients with non-frontal lobe injury. However, neuropsychological studies found considerable discrepancies in performances on the WCST in patients with frontal lobe damage. Established studies examined the neuro-cognitive functions in focal brain lesion patients. However, controversy remains over whether cognitive impairment is due to a focal brain lesion or due to diffuse brain lesions. Therefore, it is clinically valuable to examine cognitive functions in the performance on the WCST. We compared the results of the WCST with the results of the other neuropsychological tests. We also analyzed cognitive functions in the performance of the WCST in patients with Parkinson’s disease using regression analyses. Methods: To examine cognitive functions in the performance of the WCST, we investigated the differences of WCST performance and other neuropsychological tests in patients with Parkinson’s disease (n=143). Stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed with 4 indices (total correct response, perseverative response, perseverative errors and categories completed) of the WCST as regressand. Attention, visual-spatial function, naming ability, set shifting ability, verbal fluency, verbal delayed recall and non-verbal delayed recall were regressor. Results: Influential variables of the 4 WCST indices in Parkinson’s disease patients were not only phonemic fluency and set shifting ability but also naming ability. Furthermore, the predicted variables included in this study explained WCST for only about 30%. The best influential variable of total correct response was K-BNT. Phonemic fluency was the best influential variable of perseverative response, perseverative errors and categories completed. Conclusions: These results suggest that the performance on the WCST cannot specifically identify frontal lobe damage and that WCST is a multi-factorial and complex test.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0