메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
연세대학교 의과대학 Yonsei Medical Journal Yonsei Medical Journal 제57권 제5호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
1,145 - 1,151 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To assess the impact of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) on the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy(RALP). Materials and Methods: The medical records of 1094 men who underwent RALP from January 2007 to March 2013 were analyzedusing our database to identify 641 additional men without IPP (non-IPP group). We excluded 259 patients who presented insufficientdata and 14 patients who did not have an MRI image. We compared the following parameters: preoperative transrectal ultrasound,prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinicopathologic characteristics, intraoperative characteristics, postoperative oncologiccharacteristics, minor and major postoperative complications, and continence until postoperative 1 year. IPP grade wasstratified by grade into three groups: Grade 1 (IPP≤5 mm), Grade 2 (5 mm<IPP≤10 mm), and Grade 3 (IPP>10 mm). Results: Of the 821 patients who underwent RALP, 557 (67.8%) experienced continence at postoperative 3 months, 681 (82.9%) at6 months, and 757 (92.2%) at 12 months. According to IPP grade, there were significant differences in recovering full continenceat postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, IPP was the most powerful predictor ofpostoperative continence in patients who underwent RALP (p<0.001). Using a generalized estimating equation model, IPP also wasshown to be the most powerful independent variable for postoperative continence in patients who underwent RALP (p<0.001). Conclusion: Patients with low-grade IPP have significantly higher chances of recovering full continence. Therefore, the knownIPP grade will be helpful during consultations with patients before RALP.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0