지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.1
- 수록면
- 113 - 124 (12page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, adolescents were classified into four types based on their group bullying experiences (persecution, suffering, persecution & suffering, and no experience in persecution & suffering) and differences of adolescent psychological variables(narcissistic personality, social skill, morality) among four types were analyzed. Also, adolescent psychological variables were examined to be the discriminative variables among four group bullying types and the influential variable among psychological variables was found. The subjects were 396(197 male, 199 female) middle school students at K city. They completed the Bully/Victim Questionnaire, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, and the Defining Issues Test(DIT). Statistical analyses of data were frequency, mean, standard deviation, Chi-squared test, MANOVA, Bonferroni test, and discriminant analysis. Cronbach's alpha was computed for the reliability of the scales. SPSSWIN 20.0 was used for data analysis.
The results were as follows: First, no experience in persecution & suffering group consisted of 294(74.2%) adolescents followed by 56(14.1%) persecution group adolescents and 27(6.8%) persecution & suffering group adolescents. Suffering group consisted of 19(4.8%) adolescents and it showed the lowest frequency. Second, as a result of examining adolescent psychological variables according to group bullying type, there were significant differences in narcissistic personality and social skill. While there were significant differences in power, self-sufficient, superiority, there were no significant differences in ostentation, vanity, sense of privilege, and exploitation. Regarding social skill, there were significant differences in all subscales of social skill. However, there was no significant difference in morality. Third, as a result of examining adolescent psychological variables as the discriminative variables among group bullying types, only social skill was important to discriminate adolescent group bullying types. However, only 43.7% of four group bullying types were correctly classified into their respective group by social skill.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (70)
참고문헌 신청
Block, J. H. / 1969 / The California Child Q-set / University of California
Boulton, M. J. / 1994 / Bully/vicim problems in middle-school middle school children / British Journal of Educational Psychology 62:73~87
Callaghan, S. / 1995 / Self-concept and peer victimization among school children / Personality and Individual Difference 18(1):161~163
Davis, C. / 1996 / The two faces of narcissism; Personality dynamics of body esteem / Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15:153~166
Gazda, G. M. / 1973 / Human development / Allyn & Bacon
Boulton, M. J. / 1994 / Bully/vicim problems in middle-school middle school children / British Journal of Educational Psychology 62:73~87
Callaghan, S. / 1995 / Self-concept and peer victimization among school children / Personality and Individual Difference 18(1):161~163
Davis, C. / 1996 / The two faces of narcissism; Personality dynamics of body esteem / Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 15:153~166
Gazda, G. M. / 1973 / Human development / Allyn & Bacon
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0