본 논문은 우리나라에서 경호․경비업무를 대상으로 경호업무 효율성에 영향을 미치는 요인
을 밝히는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 기존의 경호업무 및 조직의 효율성에 관한 문헌들을
조사하고, 경호업무 효율성에 영향을 끼칠 것으로 생각되는 변수들을 찾아 경호업무 종사자나
경력자들에게 설문조사를 통한 영향요인을 경험적으로 확인하며, 공공경호와 민간경호업무를
비교분석하고, 이 분석 결과를 토대로 장차 경호업무를 효율적으로 수행하기 위해서는 어떤
요인에 초점을 두어야 하는지에 대한 정책적 함의를 검토하고자 하였다.
통계적으로 유의성이 있는 변수의 회귀계수를 보면 공공경호에서 조직구성원의 사기, 사전정
보의 입수, 종합팀워크훈련, 행사예산 지원, 조직분위기이며, 그 영향력의 크기는 공공경호에서
행사예산 지원, 사전정보의 입수, 종합팀워크훈련, 조직분위기, 조직구성원의 사기 순이며, 경
호 실무실습과 상호간 커뮤니케이션은 음(-)의 부호로서 이론적 기대와 다르게 나타났다. 민간
경호에서는 유의성이 있는 변수의 회귀계수를 보면 경호기본의식, 종합팀워크훈련, 방탄장비
및 차량, 인원의 선발 및 배치, 행사지원 예산, 조직 내의 갈등, 조직구성원에 대한 보상, 사회적
우호 분위기, 돌발사건 등의 변수가 통계적으로 유의미하다는 것으로 나타났으며, 그 영향력의
크기는 행사지원 예산, 종합팀워크훈련, 사회적 우호 분위기, 조직구성원에 대한 보상, 방탄장
비 및 차량, 조직 내의 갈등, 인원의 선발 및 배치, 돌발사건, 경호 기본의식 순으로 나타났다
Objectives of this study is develop security services through determinants analysis
on the efficiency of security works regarding security and guarding business in Korea
because nowadays the modern society like Korea let alone all over the world faces
the increase of dangerous factors in every security field of the human societies, and
also it is the very present situation that an individual's life even the national security
itself can be at the risk without guaranteeing the efficiency of the security services.
For this purpose, this study reviewed related documents, surveyed and interviewed
security personnels to identify what the potentially influential factors are in both
the public and private security organizations regarding the efficiency of present
security services and organizations, and what differences are. Also, comparing the
public and private security sectors, this study intended to suggest policy agendas
how to enhance the efficiency of security services in the future. This study surveyed
the 177 agents and former agents of the Presidential Security Service(PSS) for the
public security sector, and also surveyed, interviewed, and internet-based polled 821
randomly selected personnels for the private security sector.
This research showed that regarding the efficiency of the security services number
of independent variables which had positive responses in the public security sector
was more than that in the private security sector. Among the 21 questions regarding
this issue, there were all of 21 positive responses in the public security sector while
there were 18 negative responses in the private security sector. As a result of
synthesizing all the answers of the both sides, it is possible to understand that mostly
the ratio of the positive response was much higher.
In the public security service, statistically significant variables were budget
support for events, prior access of information, an integrated teamwork training,
organizational atmosphere, morale of organization personnel. However, practical
training of the security service and mutual communication showed unexpectedly
negative(-) signs. In the private security service, statistically significant variables were budget support for events, integrated teamwork training, socially friendly
atmosphere, compensation for the personnels, bullet-proof equipments and vehicles,
mood of organization, personnel recruit and disposition, unexpected incidents and
basic attitude for security services.
In sum, while organizational personnel variables and organizational management
variables were significant in the public security service, some organizational
management variables and all socio-environment variables were statistically
significant at 5 % significance level.