메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제23권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
67 - 85 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Little attention has been attracted to the contrast in meaning between bare infinitive and to-infinitive. In traditional grammar, it has been defined that infinitival to is a function word which has no meaning of its own. And many generative grammarians like Chomsky(1957,1981) hold that to is a morpheme that ‘can hardly be said to have a meaning in any independent sense' or tense inflectional element. In contrast, I have examined infinitival to is a prepositional element through the usage of two infinitives in Old English and Middle English. This paper is an attempt to explore whether meaning differences exist between bare infinitive and to-infinitive by focusing on the meaning of the infinitive particle to as a preposition. On the syntactic and semantic grounds, I put forward two proposals: i) to preceding the infinitive has a discernable meaning that distinguishes the bare infinitive from the to-infinitive construction—it refers to the sequent movement between the infinitive and the matrix verb in a time continuum, ii) to is capable of evoking an event of non-realized or possible future. Futhermore, considering a wide range of full verbs having different semantic properties such as help, make, have, see, etc, it is concluded that the meaning of the bare infinitive can be characterized as ‘direct actualization' between the two events, whereas the to-infinitive can be analyzed as ‘indirect actualization'.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0