지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.1
- 수록면
- 813 - 820 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Various clinical scoring systems, including the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), Rockall risk score (RS), and AIMS65 score (AIMS65), have been validated to predict the clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We compared the performance of these three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with UGIB in Korea. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 286 patients with UGIB who visited emergency department. The primary outcome was the need for clinical intervention (endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical) and blood transfusion. Results: The causes of UGIB were esophageal/gastric varices in 64 patients, peptic ulcer in 168, Mallory-Weiss tear in 32, malignancy of UGI tract in eight, and unknown in 14. One hundred seventy-four (61%) patients required blood transfusion, 166 (58%) required endoscopic intervention, and 10 (3.5%) required surgical intervention. The GBS outperformed the RS and AIMS65 in predicting the need for endoscopic intervention. Conclusions: The GBS and RS were more accurate than AIMS65 in predicting the need for clinical interventions and transfusion patients with UGIB, regardless of variceal or nonvariceal bleeding. The AIMS65 may not be optimal for predicting clinical outcomes of UGIB in Korea.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
Blatchford O / 2000 / A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage / Lancet 356 : 1318 ~ 1321
Chen IC / 2007 / Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding / Am J Emerg Med 25 : 774
Cheng DW / 2012 / A modified Glasgow Blatchford score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems / Aliment Pha
Hyett BH / 2013 / The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding / Gastrointest Endosc 77 : 551 ~ 557
Jung SH / 2014 / Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding / World J Gastroenterol 20 : 1846 ~ 1851
Chen IC / 2007 / Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding / Am J Emerg Med 25 : 774
Cheng DW / 2012 / A modified Glasgow Blatchford score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems / Aliment Pha
Hyett BH / 2013 / The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding / Gastrointest Endosc 77 : 551 ~ 557
Jung SH / 2014 / Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding / World J Gastroenterol 20 : 1846 ~ 1851
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상부위장관 출혈 환자에서 위험의 계층화와 이에 따른 치료 전략
Korean Journal of Helicobacter Upper Gastrointestinal Research
2018 .01
-
응급의료센터로 내원한 60세 이상의 고령의 상부위장관출혈 환자에서 Glasgow- Blatchford 점수 체계를 이용한 초기 위험도 계측의 적절성
대한응급의학회지
2015 .01
-
Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Clinical Endoscopy
2015 .01
-
Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Clinical Endoscopy
2021 .01
-
Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Gut and Liver
2016 .01
-
Lactate Parameters Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2017 .01
-
Embolization of procedure-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention
2019 .01
-
Comparison of the AIMS65 Score with Other Risk Stratification Scores in Upper Variceal and Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Gut and Liver
2018 .01
-
The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores
Clinical Endoscopy
2015 .01
-
Endoscopy Timing in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Clinical Endoscopy
2019 .01
-
Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
Clinical Endoscopy
2022 .03
-
The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Gut and Liver
2016 .01
-
상부위장관 출혈로 내원한 정상 혈압 환자에서 활동성 출혈을 예측하기 위한 Glasgow Blatchford score, Pre-Rockall score, AIMS65 score의 유용성 검정 및 새로운 예측인자 개발을 위한 제언
대한응급의학회지
2019 .01
-
비정맥류 상부위장관 출혈의 내시경 치료
Korean Journal of Helicobacter Upper Gastrointestinal Research
2016 .01
-
The Value of Risk Scores to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Clinical Endoscopy
2021 .01
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration; Biopsy needles; Side hole; Size of lesions
Gut and Liver
2016 .01
-
Comparison of the National Early Warning Score+Lactate score with the pre-endoscopic Rockall, Glasgow-Blatchford, and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
2018 .01
-
Preclinical study of a novel ingestible bleeding sensor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Clinical Endoscopy
2024 .01
-
Is the Modified AIMS65 Score Suitable for Distinguishing the Low Risk Group and the High Risk Group for Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
대한응급의학회지
2017 .01
-
응급실에 내원한 상부위장관 정맥류 출혈 환자에서 표준진료지침의 적용이 환자의 예후 및 응급실 체류시간에 미치는 영향
대한응급의학회지
2021 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0