메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제34권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
239 - 253 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Industrial Accident Insurance is the first social insurance in Korea, first legislated on November5th 1963 and has implemented since July 1st 1964. When it was first introduced, the insurance program was applied only to the business in mining and manufacturing sectors with 500 or more employees, which amounted to about 80,000 business places. In 1992, the coverage expanded to the business with 5 or more employees. In July 2000 it finally covers all businesses with one or more employees. A major change of <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act> is made on December 14th 2007 in reflection of the tripartite agreement. The changes include adding grounds for the rehab benefit, coverage of special type workers and clear standards of recognition of occupational accidents.  Enforcement Decree and Enforcement rules for the Act are also amended. According the amendment, the exception provisions under its Enforcement Decree was enacted for those who supply labor services similar to workers and need protection from occupational accidents because <Labor Standard Act> is not applicable to them. Like as, Insurance planner, Driver of concrete mixer truck, Teachers of the study aid and Golf caddy. But concrete definition of worker is not presented at <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act>. It has to be discussed whether it is the same concept as the worker in the Labor Standard Act. (eg. Regardless of the type of job, those who provide businesses with labor to earn wage)While the accident compensation rule under <Labor Standards Act> requires the number of regular workers, <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act>’s criterion is not based on the fact that they are workers, but follows the risk rate intrinsic in the business. For instance, a special type worker, who are not commonly considered a regular worker might be covered under Labor Standards Act when he is recognized as a worker belongs to the business. Meanwhile, Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act considers the riskiness of the business as well as the characteristic of the worker. The notion of employee as the insured needs to be reexamined considering that the establishment of legal elements of employment in accordance with <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act>. It is not limited to the individual labor contracts. On the contrary, the common norm of employee in social laws derives from the actual work relations as to the one in labor laws does from the work contracts. The accident in <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act> is the subject of protection for the applicable party by distributing his accountability to others, not the subject of personal liability by having the said party held responsible. This joint liability principle is explained with the social welfare aspects of the workers’ compensation. The Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act will continue to call for consistent changes and responses to them to meet the practical needs. In such changes, this study also contemplates on the norms of employee as the insured of <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act>. When the legal definitions of the workers as the insured answered, the genuine protection from the industrial accidents, the original statutory purpose of the <Industrial Accidents Compensation Insurance Act>, may be far-fetched.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0