메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제31호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
509 - 550 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The general meaning of the term “fund” is “a reserve of money set aside for purposes of achieving particular objectives or conducting particular activities.” A fund can be defined as a pool of capital or other resources set aside for a specific purpose by multiple investors with shared interests. It is a shared investment vehicle and, as if it were a living being, it is recognized as having the ability to bring together investments on behalf of its investors. In other words, a fund is virtually synonymous with the so-called “collective investment scheme,” an indirect collective investment arrangement which pools capital investments from numerous investors. A specialized professional oversees and manages the pooled investments and distributes income profits to the investors. In Korea, both the fund concept and the Indirect Asset Management Act(IAMA)'s definition of an indirect investment scheme share almost the same meaning. “Private equity fund(PEF)” generally refers to a pool of private investments raised by investment experts from a relatively small number of investors. A private equity fund typically takes the form of a limited partnership in which a fund manager makes a substantial investment and becomes a general partner with unlimited liability. On the other hand, investors in the fund become limited partners with limited liability. Especially, the writer is concerned about several legal problems and ameliorative plans of PEF in Korea. One of the serious problems of PEF in Korea is that as a rule limited partners are highly likely to rule over the executive staffs as main investors. In addition, the situation, in which a corporation with a deep pocket in real sense can avoid its legal responsibility by making a Private Equity Firm as a subsidiary according to the exception clause of the IAMA which allows a corporation to be an unlimited partners, can be a critical weakness of the this scheme. In this regard, the writer has tried to present the viable alternatives to solve the above problems as those may not seem to be so cogent. The writer personally hopes that this thesis can be a catalyst in igniting the substantial debate on this issue in the future.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0