메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 신학연구소 신학과 철학 신학과 철학 제26호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
141 - 162 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The debate between free will and determinism has been a controversial issue of philosophy. Despite the fact that many people believe in human free will, there is no definite way to prove its existence. Along with the development of physics and neurobiology, the debate between these two theories has taken other aspects, which are different from traditional approaches. On one side, on the basis of Newtonian physics, some philosophers maintain that physical determinism dominates mental events in the brain; at the other side, other philosophers insist that free will can be possible because of quantum indeterminism. However, quantum indeterminism also presents a problem to free will: the matter of random chance. Because of problems in free-will theory, philosophers such as compatabilists, who believe that free will and determinism are compatible, have insisted on changing the definition of free will. In this article, however, I have kept the definition of free will in which people generally believe, and examined doubts and problems that physical determinism and quantum indeterminism present to the free will. In this article, I suggest an expanded model to overcome the problems of free will, which is different from dualism. Traditionally, dualism gives rise to the mind-body problem. Since it categorically separates the two domains, how can consciousness in the mental domain affect matter in the physical domain? In the expanded domain model, however, the physical domain is not excluded from the mental domain. Rather, the mental domain includes it. The premises of physical determinism and quantum indeterminism are materialism, the causal closure of physics, and reductionism. With the expanded domain model, I have attempted to justify two features of free will . autonomy and availability of possible alternatives. Nonetheless, though this model can provide a way to solve the problems of free will, it presently has its own difficulty: the postulated free will aspect of our mental domain lies beyond the physical domain and is accessible only by the self, which makes the mental domain difficult for objective study. Still, however, I believe that it will not remain a subjective area forever. As the fundamental substance of science has changed from the four elements of Empedocles to elementary particles in Quantum Mechanics, there will hopefully someday be a way to research the subjective area of our mental domain.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0