메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 신학연구소 신학과 철학 신학과 철학 제17호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
207 - 235 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The debates over the validity of inductive reasoning don’t seem to be settled in the near future, if not for ever. All efforts to find a solution have so far met with little success. Hume’s scathing attack on the unjustifability of inductive reasoning is an embarrassing shock to the world of science, because science is built on induction. This also unseats the popular image of science that sees science as something qualitatively different from, superior to and ideal for any knowledge enterprise. Many proposals have been made in order to save the rational face of science, either by providing some sort of rational basis for inductive reasoning or by devising alternative scientific methods. But unfortunately all such attempts have been proved inadequate. The necessary reliance on inductive reasoning, which unfortunately lacks the deductive certainty, which is usually associated with science, seems to teach some basic lessons, not only for science, but also for human life. In this short essay I intend to discuss: i) The venerable tradition of inductive reasoning, ⅱ) The inadequacy of the various attempts to solve or dissolve the problem of inductive reasoning, ⅲ) Its inevitability though it is unjustified, and ⅳ) Its implications for science and life.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0