메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제57호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
425 - 465 (41page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Article 74 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is a basic rule defining the general extent of the obligation to pay damages for all cases in which the CISG provides for such an obligation. CISG Article 74 limits the liability to pay damages to the loss which the party in breach foresaw or ought to have foreseen at the time of the conclusion of the contract, in the light of the circumstances of which he then knew or ought to have known, as a possible consequence of the breach of contract. This foreseeability rule can be traced back to an Anglo-American rule initiated by the English Court of Exchequer in Hadley v. Baxendale, 156 Eng. Rep. 145 (Ex. 1854). The foreseeability rule has its greatest relevance in limiting recovery for consequential damages, including loss of profit. Such damages depend on the promisee's particular circumstances, the arrangements he has made, or the surrounding economic framework; in general they are recoverable only if the promisor knew of the relevant circumstances or at least a reasonable person in his position ought to have contemplated them. The foreseeability rule as provided in CISG Article 74 is different in several respects from the Hadely rule as developed through later cases in the common law jurisdictions. First, under CISG Article 74 the foreseeability of the loss must be judged from the view-point of the party in breach, whereas at common law foreseeability is determined by what is in the reasonable contemplation of the parties. In another matter, while CISG Article 74 refers to the foreseeability of damages, the original Hadley rule requires their contemplation. In yet another matter, CISG Article 74 limits recovery to those damages which the party in breach knew or ought to have known as a possible consequence of the breach, while the original Hadely rule limits recovery of lost profits to those that were in the contemplation of both parties, at the time they made the contracts, as the probable result of the breach. This possibly means that the breaching party may be liable for a greater range of consequential damages under the CISG regime than under the common law tradition. These differences, taken together, clearly suggest that it would be erroneous if anyone attempts to interpret or apply CISG Article 74 solely referring to the Hadley rule. In one of the leading U.S. cases applying CISG Article 74, Delchi Carrier SpA v. Rotorex, 71 F.3d 1024 (2d Cir. 1995), a federal court awarded the buyer consequential damages for those costs incurred which were a foreseeable result of the seller's breach and which were both commercially reasonable and reasonably foreseeable. Although the court cited CISG as the controlling law, however, its decision reveals that the court was heavily influenced by domestic legal rules. In order for the CISG to remain a uniform law regulating international transactions of goods, this unfortunate homeward trend should be strongly discouraged, and as CISG Article 7 explicitly demands, CISG should at all times be interpreted autonomously, and not in the light of domestic law.
#국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약 #CISG 제74조 #계약위반 #손해의 산정 #결과적 손해 #예견가능성 #원칙 #The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods #CISG Article 74 #Breach of Contract #Measure of Damages #Consequential Damages #Foreseeability #Hadley Rule

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청
/ 1987 / Knapp, “Damages in General” in C. Bianca and M. Bonnell, Commentary on the International Sales Law, The 1980 Vienna Sales Convention google schola A. Murphey, Jr. / 1989 / Consequential Damages in Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Legacy of Hadley / Geo. Wash. J. Int'l L. & Econ. 23 : 415 ~ google schola Comment / 1956 / Lost Profits as Contract Damages: Problems of Proof and Limitations on Recovery / Yale L.J. 65 : 1020 ~ google schola Eric Schneider / 1995 / Consequential Damages in The International Sale of Goods: Analysis of Two Decisions / U. Pa. J. Int'l Bus. L. 16 : 615 ~ google schola Franco Ferrari / 2009 / Homeward Trend and Lex Forism Despite Uniform Sales Law / Vindobona J. Int'l. L. & Arb 13 : 15 ~ google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0