지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 통일연구원 International Journal of Korean Unification Studies International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 제16권 제1호
- 발행연도
- 2007.1
- 수록면
- 73 - 101 (29page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The six-party nuclear talks which began in August 2003 have produced the September 19, 2005 and the February 13, 2007 agreements for denuclearizing the Korean peninsula. This article analyzes and evaluates the two agreements and proposes a three-phase roadmap for the Korean peninsula denuclearization. Although the 9.19 agreement included only general terms of principles for designing a detailed roadmap for denuclearizing the Korean peninsula, it marked the first specific agreement among the six parties. The Feb. 13 initial actions agreement was a first step toward implementing the 9.19 agreement in a phased manner in line with the principle of ‘action for action.’ The nuclear deal was made possible primarily because President Bush was willing to take a new flexible approach to reach a deal with North Korea. Based on initial actions, disablement, and dismantlement phases in the Korean peninsula nuclear disarmament process, the author proposes a three-phase roadmap for denuclearizing the Korean peninsula. North Korea’s nuclear issue--a serious international issue as the most important obstacle to the Korean peace process--needs to be resolved peacefully through the six-party process. While the six-party process is the best means to resolve North Korea’s nuclear issue, US-North Korea bilateral talks are necessary and essential for a peaceful resolution of North Korea’s nuclear issue. There are a number of difficult key issues yet to be resolved at the six-party talks. Both US and North Korea’s hard-line policies cannot resolve these issues peacefully and therefore, both sides need to be flexible about their respective positions with political will to make a compromise in order to eventually achieve the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Birth and Revival of North Korea’s Denuclearization Policy for the Korean Peninsula
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
제4차 6자회담의 의미와 한국의 정책방향
국제관계연구
2005 .09
-
Toward a Governance System and Political Understanding to Permit a Verified Nuclear-free Korean Peninsula: Policy Developments and Operational Challenges
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2014 .01
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
Search for Peaceful Resolution of the North Korean Nuclear Issue
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2006 .01
-
한반도의 비핵화에 관한 공동선언
통일법연구
2017 .10
-
How to Resolve the North Korean Nuclear Issue: From a Commitment Problem Perspective
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2020 .01
-
북핵문제와 한반도 통일
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2012 .03
-
6자 회담의 회고와 전망 : 2006년 말 중국 학자의 시각
국방정책연구
2007 .01
-
Issues Regarding North Korean Denuclearization Roadmap with a Focus on Implications from the Iran Nuclear Deal
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
평화협정의 유형에 따른 한반도 평화체제의 경로
세계지역연구논총
2017 .01
-
North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Threat: Recalibration of Policy Measures
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
북핵문제와 한국의 대응 : 북핵 확산을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2016 .06
-
中朝关系与中国的朝核政策
국제지역학논총
2009 .12
-
North Korea in Transition: Changes in Internal Politics and the Logic of Survival
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2009 .01
-
China and the Korean Peninsula: A Chinese View on the North Korean Nuclear Issue
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2007 .01
-
India’s Policy towards the North Korean Nuclear Weapons Program
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0