지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
North Korea facing crisis unheard of since the Cold War
1. North Korea being the verge of isolation crisis unheard of in the international community
2. Survival and security of country on the verge of threat unheard of
3. National economy system on the verge of collapse unheard of
New paradigm of diplomacy of North Korea
1，National benefits prevailing ideology; objective of diplomacy with the top priority being secure and stable sovereignty
2，Foreign policies defined upon basis of diplomacy with China; while top priority for diplomacy assigned to diplomacy with U.S.
3，Promoting easing tension in the Korean Peninsular with initiative exercised by North Korea
4，Attempting to secure initiative in diplomacy, and funds circulated in the international communities by denying the current international system, and withdrawal from NPT
5，Securing diplomatic initiative through exercising cliff-edge strategy and isolation policy by exploiting the North Korea Nuclear Challenge; and responding against threat to security from South Korea and U.S. via both of provocation and negotiation
Difference in strategic understandings and perception between North Korea and China
1. Ambiguity of alliance relationship ? Alliance relationship altered to that of ‘friend but not real friend'. China is the patron which North Korea relies on for survival as well as an entity which the latter shall keep a sharp lookout for.
2. Differentiation of international order ? Both North Korea and China had been rebels as well as challengers to the established international orders and systems. However, unlike North Korea indicating no change in its position, China has been developed a big power willingly accepting and responsible for the international orders and systems.
3. Duplexity of development lines ? Both North Korea and China had adapted the socialism line of the Soviet model; however China shifted its line to its own unique socialism line after employing the innovative open policies, and this caused dissenting opinion from North Korea.
4. Marketing of financial aids ? North Korea had enjoyed free financial aids from China, however deviation took place in the principle of financial aids between North Korea and China since the latter applied market economic rules to financial aids for other countries.
5. Equal treatment of diplomatic policies both for South Korea and North Korea ? Shifting from policies mainly beneficial for North Korea, China currently established strategic partnership with South Korea, and keeps its policies for issues in the Korean Peninsula equilateral to the both countries.
6. Conflict in positions for the North Korea Nuclear Challenge ? Conflict between the strategic objective of North Korea for preserving nuclear forces, and the position of China indicating denuclearization in the Korean Peninsula
Consideration and cognition of diplomatic policies of China for North Korea
Dilemma of China: When considering the power, effects to the world, and historical relationship with North Korea, China is capable of neither fully controlling nuclear testing in North Korea, nor altering actions that would give impact on the policies of U.S. for the North Korea nuclear challenge, or the situations in the Korean Peninsula.
Consequently, China passively responds to radical assertion of North Korea, and pays huge costs for returning North Korea to the Six-Party Talk whenever issue of the North Korea Nuclear Challenge takes place, while it is led by U.S., South Korea and Japan in actions to the issue. Even if China well recognizes that any sanction of UN to the North Korea yields no positive results, it votes in favor of every UN resolution for sanctions to North Korea showing alteration in the role of an intermediate exercised so far. China shall remind the lesson learned from the processes of handling the Indian nuclear issue.
Requirements for new paradigm to resolving nuclear challenge
13，Establishing a position of an intermediate
14，Rational reform of the International NPT system
15，Providing international environment favorable for nuclear program elimination
16，Insisting only and sole role of the Six-Party Talk
17，Preventing excessively sensitive reaction to nuclear testing in North Korea
18，Inviting North Korea to international community
1. North Korea being the verge of isolation crisis unheard of in the international community
2. Survival and security of country on the verge of threat unheard of
3. National economy system on the verge of collapse unheard of
New paradigm of diplomacy of North Korea
1，National benefits prevailing ideology; objective of diplomacy with the top priority being secure and stable sovereignty
2，Foreign policies defined upon basis of diplomacy with China; while top priority for diplomacy assigned to diplomacy with U.S.
3，Promoting easing tension in the Korean Peninsular with initiative exercised by North Korea
4，Attempting to secure initiative in diplomacy, and funds circulated in the international communities by denying the current international system, and withdrawal from NPT
5，Securing diplomatic initiative through exercising cliff-edge strategy and isolation policy by exploiting the North Korea Nuclear Challenge; and responding against threat to security from South Korea and U.S. via both of provocation and negotiation
Difference in strategic understandings and perception between North Korea and China
1. Ambiguity of alliance relationship ? Alliance relationship altered to that of ‘friend but not real friend'. China is the patron which North Korea relies on for survival as well as an entity which the latter shall keep a sharp lookout for.
2. Differentiation of international order ? Both North Korea and China had been rebels as well as challengers to the established international orders and systems. However, unlike North Korea indicating no change in its position, China has been developed a big power willingly accepting and responsible for the international orders and systems.
3. Duplexity of development lines ? Both North Korea and China had adapted the socialism line of the Soviet model; however China shifted its line to its own unique socialism line after employing the innovative open policies, and this caused dissenting opinion from North Korea.
4. Marketing of financial aids ? North Korea had enjoyed free financial aids from China, however deviation took place in the principle of financial aids between North Korea and China since the latter applied market economic rules to financial aids for other countries.
5. Equal treatment of diplomatic policies both for South Korea and North Korea ? Shifting from policies mainly beneficial for North Korea, China currently established strategic partnership with South Korea, and keeps its policies for issues in the Korean Peninsula equilateral to the both countries.
6. Conflict in positions for the North Korea Nuclear Challenge ? Conflict between the strategic objective of North Korea for preserving nuclear forces, and the position of China indicating denuclearization in the Korean Peninsula
Consideration and cognition of diplomatic policies of China for North Korea
Dilemma of China: When considering the power, effects to the world, and historical relationship with North Korea, China is capable of neither fully controlling nuclear testing in North Korea, nor altering actions that would give impact on the policies of U.S. for the North Korea nuclear challenge, or the situations in the Korean Peninsula.
Consequently, China passively responds to radical assertion of North Korea, and pays huge costs for returning North Korea to the Six-Party Talk whenever issue of the North Korea Nuclear Challenge takes place, while it is led by U.S., South Korea and Japan in actions to the issue. Even if China well recognizes that any sanction of UN to the North Korea yields no positive results, it votes in favor of every UN resolution for sanctions to North Korea showing alteration in the role of an intermediate exercised so far. China shall remind the lesson learned from the processes of handling the Indian nuclear issue.
Requirements for new paradigm to resolving nuclear challenge
13，Establishing a position of an intermediate
14，Rational reform of the International NPT system
15，Providing international environment favorable for nuclear program elimination
16，Insisting only and sole role of the Six-Party Talk
17，Preventing excessively sensitive reaction to nuclear testing in North Korea
18，Inviting North Korea to international community
목차
冷?后朝?面?“前所未?”困境
朝?外交的新思?
中朝?略利益??念的差?
中?朝核政策的?察?思考
?理朝核??需要新思?
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
China’s Policy and Influence on the North Korea Nuclear Issue
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2010 .01
-
North Korea's Reliance on China and China's Influence on North Korea
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
-
한중국교정상화 이후 중국의 대북 영향력 변화에 관한 고찰 : 북ㆍ중관계의 변용을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2011 .09
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
How Not To Be Abandoned by China: North Korea’s Nuclear Brinkmanship Revisited
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
북중관계 변화의 동인과 시진핑시대의 대북정책
국제정치연구
2015 .06
-
국내의 중국·북한관계 연구 현황과 과제
통일정책연구
2004 .01
-
From a Buffer Zone to a Strategic Burden: Evolving Sino-North Korea Relations during Hu Jintao Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2010 .01
-
China’s Policies toward North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Programs
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2015 .01
-
북한의 핵실험과 중국의 군사외교적 대응
한국군사학논집
2010 .06
-
Coexistence of North Korea’s Nuclear Development and Economic Sanctions: The Dilemma of Policy Value Difference
Journal of Peace and Unification
2019 .01
-
북핵문제와 한국의 대응 : 북핵 확산을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2016 .06
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
An Enduring Dilemma on the Korean Peninsula: The North Korean Nuclear Conundrum and South Korea’s Strategic Choices
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
-
What Factors Determine China’s North Korea Policy?: Uncertainty, Instability and Status Quo Risk Management
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2019 .01
-
Prospects for China’s North Korea Strategy in the Post-Kim Jong-il Era and Implications for South Korea
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2012 .01
-
The Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions on North Korea: China's Vital Role
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-349-002944600