메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국문학교육학회 문학교육학 문학교육학 제32호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
63 - 86 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The ultimate goal of literary education should be focused on leading students' abilities in terms of ‘speaking/listening/reading/writing’ to those of a writer. That does not mean the writer-level abilities to use the native language are limited simply to the functional or instrumental aspects of the language. Speech and literary works can never be separated from writers’ lives. Accordingly, the objective of literary education to achieve a writer-level skills of the native language is naturally directed to writers’ views on life and world. That is why we as educators teaching literature should consistently retrace literary works related to 4‧19 Revolution. There is a general consensus among the educators that the purpose of the education lies in such modern concepts as ‘freedom,’ ‘democracy,’ and ‘citizens.’ It is 4‧19 Revolution period that such concepts were profoundly speculated about and the results of the speculation were turned into literary configuration nearly firstly throughout the history of this country. Consequently, education today should refer to 4‧19 Revolution and be subject to self-modification. In that sense, Kim Sooyoung needs focusing on before others. As early as in 1960’s, Kim Sooyoung cast off the framework of ‘logocentrical thought’ that we desperately try to overcome now. His goal was to reach freedom through diverse and liberal ways. Further, to put that into practice, he advocated love instead of fighting. From that perspective, the reality where they stick to the ‘canonicity in analyzing literary works’ in the field of teaching poetic literature is considered a problem that should be coped with first. It is imperative that we should break away from the conservatism in the field of education as soon as possible to build a reality where the ‘plurality in analyzing literary works’ is honored. Moreover, it is urgent and necessary to study on models and methods to fairly assess the ability to analyze and accept literary works as such.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0