메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제31권 제3호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
73 - 90 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Graham Greene is different from Flannery O'Connor in many ways. Greene enjoyed travelling internationally, and O'Connor was mostly confined to Georgia. Whereas she wrote novellas and short stories, he was good at novels. O'Connor liked grotesque characters and violence. Greene, however, preferred to portray ordinary human life. Greene, a converted Catholic, was unease with dogma, but O'Connor, a born Catholic, vindicated it. Nevertheless, they have a common denominator that they are Catholic writers. Particularly, it attracts critical attention that both of them read avidly modern theologians. Greene could not stay at ease within the pale of Christian orthodoxy that he turned to modern theologians. O'Connor hearkened to them who put emphasis on concrete human experience as she did as a novelist. It is ironical that O'Connor who advocated Christian orthodox belief preferred liberal theologians. It is understandable, however, that Greene and O'Connor who had to present concrete reality and human sensual experience to reveal mystery in their work liked modern theologians who advanced “the theology from below.” Such a common factor of concrete experience in novel and modern theology led them to join together in the work of Greene and O'Connor.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0