메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미시학회 현대영미시연구 현대영미시연구 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
103 - 136 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the creative undecidability generated by the poetics of paradox implied in William Carlos Williams’ Spring and All, an experimental work composed of poetry and prose. Williams emphasizes “contact” with local experience as the basis of good writing. But he also attempts to attain artistic autonomy separated from reality through imagination. In Spring and All, he tries to unite these paradoxical demands into a “design,” a second reality to rival the real world. But Williams’ design is not consistently achieved in his poetic practice. Some poems, such as “The Red Wheelbarrow” and “The Rose,” show his success in artistic composition by imagination. Especially, “The Rose” is full of the creative dynamics produced by the Cubist collage technique, crossing the “edge” between the real and the artificial. On the other hand, other poems in the same work reveal his dilemma in overcoming the pressure of social convention and taming the irritable elements into an artistic new order. This characteristic is mainly prominent in the poems which deal with the contemporary American culture. In these poems, the individual elements do not cohere into a poetic composition and the poet fails to articulate a new American cultural identity. But Williams paradoxically succeeds in saving the plurality of America by resisting against the force of cultural assimilation and homogenization. Spring and All is a heterogeneous text filled with creative tension caused by diverse contradictory elements which anticipates the form of Paterson.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0