메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제14권 제1호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
51 - 78 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The critical evaluation of John Keats has almost always involved issues of vulgarity, effeminacy, and puerility. Keats has constantly been re-created in the discourse of literary critics who confronted, interpreted, and negotiated the “effeminate” characteristics that they associated with Keats typified in Byron's telling reference to him as “Johnny” Keats. The male subjectivity that critics assumed of the true poet and the effeminate traits of Keat’s person and poetry seemed mutually incompatible and had to be resolved. I argue that both the favorable and the hostile evaluations of Keats and his works depended on how successfully one accommodated or repudiated his effeminacy. In contemporary evaluations Keats never escaped references to his “mawkishness” and to the “Cockney,” a term dissonant with the normative masculinity of the hegemonic class. Even when Keats’s fame was consolidated in Victorian England, the image of Keats as a poet of sensuality and sensation (not of thoughts), of promises (not of accomplishments), and of effeminacy (not of respectable masculine subjectivity) persisted. Critics had to confront the overwhelming presence of “Johnny Keats” either to denigrate or praise him. Whether they praised or denigrated him, critics wanted to kill the figure of “Johnny Keats” because an effeminate poet could not be part of the tradition of English poetry.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0