메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
429 - 450 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After the seller sells their real estate to the first purchaser, the seller goes on to conclude a separate contract with a second purchaser and completes a registration of transfer of ownership. This kind of case is called a double sale of real estate. Generally speaking, the main party who is to be protected against double sale of real estate is the first purchaser. According to various views and case studies, they take on the antisocial nullification perspective and states that double sale of real estate falls under the category of Civil Law No. 103 antisocial law action and will therefore become void. This void is considered absolute and cannot be contested even by an innocent third party. As a result, the innocent party who had purchased the property in question from the second purchaser cannot be protected. Antisocial nullification perspective, taking on by the case, has been the support to protect the first assignee. That is following by our Civil Law which select the formalism on transfer of real rights. But as previously stated, antisocial nullification perspective has a lot of problems and other theories which show up in order to solve the problems don't do them perfectly either. So restitution perspective by tort is supposed to be the most valid view as of now, but it still has the problems under the construction of Civil Law which takes on the principle of pecuniary compensation for damage. Finally for solving the various problems from the antisocial double sale, it is more valid to provide explicitly that restitution as a compensation for damage is possible like German Civil Law. In these aspects, the revised bill of Civil Law No. 394-1, 'Compensation for damage is done by money. But creditor can claim the restitution if there are proper reasons.', is judged well-timed provision. Especially antisocial double sale might be the typical case to admit the restitution as a exception of the pecuniary compensation for damage.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0