메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국재산법학회 재산법연구 재산법연구 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
175 - 211 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Mercantile law is a lex specialis of the civil law. However, mercantile law does not completely fulfill the legal demand for commercial transactions, and is applied with civil law. Therefore, the statement that mercantile law is a special type of civil law should be recognized in such a way that an article in civil law, in correspondence to an article of mercantile law, should follow the article in mercantile law. If an institution of civil law repeats itself in specific institution of mercantile law and its subjects, the only way to integrate the two based on civil law that applies to basic law is to start from the results of legal research of mercantile institution. On the contrary, the casual approach which starts from legal theories denies the peculiar and independent characteristics of mercantile law and is seen as an approach that does not fully consider the peculiarities of the law from reality. However, it is noticeable that especially field of commercial activities and commercial general provisions that accentuates their relation to civil law is in a blind spot, far from the area of main interest for mercantile law. The prerequisite requirements for the integration of civil law and mercantile law in way of legal theories, and not simply the integration of the two, have to be approved by the legal sources and the aspects of mercantile law. If not approved, the integration would not be plausible. Art. 1 Commercial Code for the existing forms of law for commercial transactions states, ｢if the original law by business affairs does not have regulations, rely on mercantile law and if there is no mercantile law, follow regulations of civil law｣. Studies of mercantile law often analyze that mercantile law is based on general principles od civil law, but they also state that the field in which civil law applies is different from the field in which mercantile applies, and therefore agree that civil law does not equal the area in which mercantile law can be applied to. As a result, it is said, Art. 1 Commercial Code is no more than the regulation of applied law of order that relate to business affairs. Nonetheless, nowadays, the definition on merchants and commercial activities does not only completely lack the skill, but they also we can conclude that civil law lacks the characteristics of special relation laws from the fact that the function of civil law as a basic law has been disregarded. Thus, from the perspective of the legal sources, the basic for the integration of civil law and mercantile law has already been established. On the other hand, the attitude of trying to approving general terms and conditions and commercial autonome rules that apply to the interpretation of business affairs as a part of law is improper, because in order to be approved, they should have to have solid foundation in (real-world) law. Next, the distinction between customary mercantile law and (real-world) mercantile law is unclear. The distinction is unclear especially between customary mercantile law and factual mercantile custom, but considering that the supreme court established that customary mercantile law is a law with an effect to fulfill which exists objectiv, the dibate about a customary mercantile law is now exhaustive. From an aspect, the fact that that customary mercantile law and true customs are approved by the court’s trial activities is not any different from any others. Furthermore, we cannot deny that commercial transactional practices play a big role in trial activities, unlike civil law, but we must keep in mind that this is only in theory. Finally, the codification of laws enacted is centered on ideas of reform, integration and rationalization, and such philosophy is achieved through legal amendments. The integration of civil law and mercantile law should also free itself of existing legal conflicts and contradictions that are caused by different fields in which the two apply, and start from reasonably elaborating the theories. Surely, in case of considering a new code there shall be no need to comprehend the two laws, because the theoretical conflicts that concern the court can be eliminated by the method of legislation. In any situation, it is hard for any integration where the principles of mercantile law is not arranged clearly to have any value. If the principles of mercantile law are not straightened, the special existing form of law court can make the integration meaningless by accentuating the peculiarities of mercantile law. For that reason, cooperation of the scholars of mercantile law and civil law for integration of the two laws is clearly an urgent issue. 
#상법 #민법 #상사관습법 #사실인 상관습 #민?상법의 통합 #상인 #상행위 #상거래 #민법의 특별법 #Mercantile Law #Civil Law #the Integration of Civil Law and Mercantile Law #Custom #Customary Mercantile Law #Real-World) Mercantile Law #Existing Forms of Law #Commercial Transactions

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청
/ 1979 / K.Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 4. Aufl., 1979 google schola / 1985 / H.Hubner, Allgemeiner Teil des Burgerlichen Gesetzbuches, 1985 google schola / 1992 / G.Dilcher, Mittelalterliche Rechtsgewohnheit als methodisch-theoretisches Problem, in: G.Dilcher/H.Luck/R.Schulze/E.Wadle/J.Weitzel/U.Wolter, Gewohnheitsrecht und Rechtsgewoh google schola / 2005 / Munchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch(MunchKommHGB), Bd. 1 (1. Buch. Handelsstand §§ 1-104), 2. Aufl., 2005 google schola / 2007 / Gemeinschaftskommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch mit UN-Kaufrecht, 7. Aufl., Hrsg. von J.Ensthaler, 2007 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0