메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제24권 제4호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
285 - 316 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In accordance with Section 134 of the previous commercial code, any corporation shall not get a treasury stock on its own account. With respect to a financial assistance to get such treasury, our Supreme Court has interpreted that if there is a funding raised by a corporation and if profit and loss due to such acquisition(or subscription) is attributed to such corporation, such financial assistance shall considered as getting a treasury stock. Thus it finds that such transaction shall be void and null. In spite of constant conclusion of the court, application to a case has never been that clear. Moremore, new commercial code amended in 2011 allows some treasury stock transaction on certain conditions. I think more precise analysis on financial assistance is necessary under this new rule. For this, I review all the relevant court cases and findings thereon. I also study on purposes of restriction on treasury stock to look at application of this new rule. I think financial assistance is not considered as a legal treasury stock acquisition given the current rule requires the company to get such stock in its own name. Funding requirement is interpreted as the case where the company gets loss due to such fund raising. Finally, profit-loss condition is to regarded as "AND" condition because the most similar case to a treasury stock is to be regulated as a treasury stock rule.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0