메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제15권 제1호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
193 - 232 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A very enormous risk is involved in international trade because a large amount of money is involved in and there is a gap between delivery of agreed goods and payment. Hence seller and buyer tend to select payment method of Letter of Credit(L/C) that links documentary draft with payment undertaking of banks. As we know, the letter of credit was developed by commercial needs. But As times have gone by, many principles arouse. The autonomy, abstract and strict compliance priniciple underlie L/C. so, L/C functions as well under these principles. But As there is no rule but no exception, in a given case exception from application of these principles is allowed. This is so called “fraud exception” or “fraud rule.” Because the fraud exception rule constitutes contracting out an application of basic principles, this rule should apply restrictively and in many authorities a court do not apply this rule to nominated bank, confirming bank, and bona fide holder of draft even if fraud is involved in L/C transactions. If not, we lose a lot of benefits from the credit as valuable commercial device through reservation of these principles to take a few benefits. So, We must bear in mind that the fraud exception rule should apply restrictively. Hence, this study analyzes condition of application and exception from application of fraud exception rule in view of Uniform Commercial Code Article 5-109(a) this study.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0