지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether children’s evaluation of information provided by an informant differs depending on the intuitiveness of the information provided, the presence of and types of additional explanations, and the age of the child.
Methods: The participants were 158 children, aged 4 to 5 years, from eight child-care centers located in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Each child was interviewed individually, after completing a pre-test for measures of language comprehension.
Results: First, when the informant provided information on physical and biological phenomena, children were more likely to evaluate intuitive information as plausible, compared to counterintuitive information. In addition, 5-year-olds were less likely than 4-year-olds to evaluate counterintuitive information as plausible. Second, after an explanation was added, children were more likely to evaluate counterintuitive information as plausible, when this explanation was causal rather than descriptive or circular. Third, the addition of an explanation was likely to result in the evaluation of intuitive information as less plausible, and counterintuitive information as more plausible.
Conclusion: Based on children"s evaluation of information about physical and biological phenomena presented to them, this study confirmed that 4- and 5-year-old children were able to independently evaluate the plausibility of information, depending on the intuitiveness of the information, and the presence of and types of explanations. It also revealed that with increasing age, children become more skeptical about the plausibility of counterintuitive information, and demonstrated epistemic vigilance even when presented with intuitive information with an explanation.
Methods: The participants were 158 children, aged 4 to 5 years, from eight child-care centers located in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Each child was interviewed individually, after completing a pre-test for measures of language comprehension.
Results: First, when the informant provided information on physical and biological phenomena, children were more likely to evaluate intuitive information as plausible, compared to counterintuitive information. In addition, 5-year-olds were less likely than 4-year-olds to evaluate counterintuitive information as plausible. Second, after an explanation was added, children were more likely to evaluate counterintuitive information as plausible, when this explanation was causal rather than descriptive or circular. Third, the addition of an explanation was likely to result in the evaluation of intuitive information as less plausible, and counterintuitive information as more plausible.
Conclusion: Based on children"s evaluation of information about physical and biological phenomena presented to them, this study confirmed that 4- and 5-year-old children were able to independently evaluate the plausibility of information, depending on the intuitiveness of the information, and the presence of and types of explanations. It also revealed that with increasing age, children become more skeptical about the plausibility of counterintuitive information, and demonstrated epistemic vigilance even when presented with intuitive information with an explanation.
목차
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
참고문헌 (90)
참고문헌 신청
Renee Baillargeon / 1986 / Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants / Cognition 23(1):21~41
Renée Baillargeon / 2016 / How Do Infants Learn About the Physical World? / Current Directions in Psychological Science 3(5):133~140
Igor Bascandziev / 2016 / The beautiful and the accurate: Are children’s selective trust decisions biased? / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 152:92~105
Laura A. Baum / 2008 / Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 100(2):146~155
Stéphane Bernard / 2012 / The power of well-connected arguments: Early sensitivity to the connective because / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 111(1):128~135
Renée Baillargeon / 2016 / How Do Infants Learn About the Physical World? / Current Directions in Psychological Science 3(5):133~140
Igor Bascandziev / 2016 / The beautiful and the accurate: Are children’s selective trust decisions biased? / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 152:92~105
Laura A. Baum / 2008 / Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 100(2):146~155
Stéphane Bernard / 2012 / The power of well-connected arguments: Early sensitivity to the connective because / Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 111(1):128~135
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인과적 설명에 대한 유아의 평가 및 기억의 발달과 수용언어 능력의 관계
육아지원연구
2023 .12
-
Information Avoidance Experience in the Context of Information Seeking
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2022 .04
-
발달･지체장애 아동부모의 특수체육교육기관 정보신뢰도에 따른 정보이용행동에 미치는 영향
인문사회 21
2020 .01
-
개인정보자기결정권과 공개된 개인정보의영리목적 활용
법과 정책연구
2019 .01
-
코로나19의 공기 전염에 대한 상반된 정보와 정보추구 및 회피행동: 정보 불충분성과 정보 불확실성의 매개 효과
한국소통학보
2022 .11
-
타인의 설명에 대한 비판적 이해의 발달: 인과적 설명에 대한 유아의 평가와 기억, 수용언어 능력과의 관계
한국육아지원학회 학술대회지
2023 .05
-
유표적 정보구조의 기능에 관한 연구 - 지시적 신정보가 관계적 구정보로 표상되는 유형을 중심으로 -
문법교육
2018 .01
-
신용정보에 관한 연구
법학논총
2015 .01
-
직관에 반하는 정보에 대한 유아의 판단과 실행기능의 관련성
아동학회지
2021 .06
-
코로나19에서의 부정적 감정, 정보 불충분성, 정보 추구로의 경로 이해 : 정치 성향·신뢰하는 정보 경로의 다집단 분석을 중심으로
한국소통학보
2024 .02
-
행정정보의 공동이용에 대한 법적 쟁점의 검토
행정법연구
2017 .12
-
중국 내 개인정보의 수집 및 해외이전에 관한 법적 보호에 대한 연구
법학연구
2020 .06
-
예비보육교사의 아동권리 인식에 관한 주관성 연구
한국가족복지학
2019 .01
-
정보공개제도상의 정보부존재에 관한 고찰 : 중앙행정기관을 중심으로
기록학연구
2015 .10
-
기업의 부가가치정보와 ESG평가정보가 외국인지분율에 미치는 영향
글로벌경영학회지
2024 .08
-
스마트폰의 정보활용과 소비자 정보수용도에 관한 연구
소비자문제연구
2015 .08
-
일본 개정개인정보보호법의 주요내용과 그 시사점
공법학연구
2017 .11
-
아동관련법과 정책에 대한 아동학의 역할
아동학회지
2016 .12
-
생체인식정보의 보호와 이용에 관한 법제정비방안에 관한 연구
유럽헌법연구
2019 .01
-
개인위치정보의 수집으로 인한 손해배상책임 - 대법원 2018. 5. 30. 선고 2015다251539, 251546, 251553, 251560, 251577 판결
법학논집
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-598-000985495