메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ki-tae Kim (Keimyung University)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제44권 제2호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
191 - 208 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study investigated power claims in weekly reports written by the ESL students who participated in an intergenerational intercultural service learning project at an assisted-living facility in a rural Mid-West city in the US. The language learners joined the “grandparents” once a week for approximately ninety minutes at the facility. On weekly average, more than ten ESL participants and more than ten “grandparent” residents participated in the project each semester from 2009 to 2010. The former were required to submit a weekly free-writing reflection after each visit. Approximately 200 reflections were compiled for three semesters. Although interaction-oriented activities and tasks were loosely structured according to such sources as Stafford-Yilmaz (1998) and Wallwork (1997), actually generated discourses between the conversational pairs or parties significantly varied as they claimed (or lack thereof) cultural expertise. Qualitatively-oriented postlinguistic analysis illustrated that three patterns of power claims in such intergenerational intercultural exchanges emerged. First, they constructed increasing expertise over the target language and culture. Second, they claimed reflexive expertise (or lack thereof) in their own culture. Last, their critical stances made institutional and societal power claims (Fairclough 1989) over the activities at the institutional level and over the institution at the societal level. These patterns demonstrated that power was dynamically, transiently, and interculturally claimed for, refused, challenged, and negotiated in the ESL reflections on the intergenerational intercultural service leaning project.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework and Previous Studies
3. Data
4. Findings
5. Conclusions
References

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-701-000901569