지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.11
- 수록면
- 127 - 147 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.35227/HYLR.2018.11.29.4.127
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Social enterprises can contribute to the society by diverse means, such as creating jobs, providing social services and improving environment. Of course, social enterprises cannot solve all the problems that may occur in a modern capitalistic society. However, social enterprises can supplement the weaknesses of modern capitalism, which may arise in the public and social areas such as welfare and environment. They in particular have business models that can benefit the socially vulnerable. Therefore, development of social enterprises can provide great opportunities in order for our society to achieve further advancement.
However, most of Korean social enterprises are still in the level of small business. That’s why social enterprises rely heavily on government’s financial supports. Although we do not deny the need for governmental supports for social enterprises, excessive reliance on them would not help to raise the self-sufficiency of Korean social enterprises. Also, current financial plans for social enterprises cannot make sufficient effects because they support for too short periods. Increasing the duration of supporting for labor costs of social enterprises will result in supporting in the most needed time periods. In addition, current financial aid plans concentrate on supporting for only labor costs to employ the socially vulnerable. This may be a constraint on the recruitment of the labor force required by the social enterprises. Considering the characteristics of the industries related with social enterprises, it is necessary to apply differentiation to the social enterprises.
In the long run, supports for social enterprises should be done by the private sector rather than by the central or local governments. To this end, a social stock exchange is needed to facilitate the financing of social enterprises. It would be easier to use the KONEX market for SMEs. It should be noted, however, that it is necessary to make sure that investors are aware of the risks and that investors should be limited only to social investors excluding ordinary investors, since investing in social enterprises is totally different from investing in stocks of ordinary corporations.
Finally, it is naturally necessary for the government to reduce supports for those social enterprises that can raise funds through social stock exchanges. On the other hand, social enterprises which are not corporations legally can not use social stock exchanges. Hence, it can raise the efficiency if the government concentrates more on these social enterprises, which are not legal corporations, in terms of financial aids.
However, most of Korean social enterprises are still in the level of small business. That’s why social enterprises rely heavily on government’s financial supports. Although we do not deny the need for governmental supports for social enterprises, excessive reliance on them would not help to raise the self-sufficiency of Korean social enterprises. Also, current financial plans for social enterprises cannot make sufficient effects because they support for too short periods. Increasing the duration of supporting for labor costs of social enterprises will result in supporting in the most needed time periods. In addition, current financial aid plans concentrate on supporting for only labor costs to employ the socially vulnerable. This may be a constraint on the recruitment of the labor force required by the social enterprises. Considering the characteristics of the industries related with social enterprises, it is necessary to apply differentiation to the social enterprises.
In the long run, supports for social enterprises should be done by the private sector rather than by the central or local governments. To this end, a social stock exchange is needed to facilitate the financing of social enterprises. It would be easier to use the KONEX market for SMEs. It should be noted, however, that it is necessary to make sure that investors are aware of the risks and that investors should be limited only to social investors excluding ordinary investors, since investing in social enterprises is totally different from investing in stocks of ordinary corporations.
Finally, it is naturally necessary for the government to reduce supports for those social enterprises that can raise funds through social stock exchanges. On the other hand, social enterprises which are not corporations legally can not use social stock exchanges. Hence, it can raise the efficiency if the government concentrates more on these social enterprises, which are not legal corporations, in terms of financial aids.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사회적 기업에 대한 재정지원 제도
Ⅲ. 사회적 기업에 대한 재정지원 방법의 개선
Ⅳ. 코넥스 시장을 활용한 자금 조달
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사회적기업가 정신과 네트워크가 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 부산시 사회적기업을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2020 .06
-
사회적 기업의 이념적 기초와 개념에 관한 연구
아주법학
2015 .01
-
한국과 일본의 사회적경제 정책의 제도화과정 비교 고찰
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2020 .07
-
사회적 금융 전문 거래시장 활성화를 위한 사회적 금융 전문 증권거래소 설립 검토
법학논총
2021 .12
-
한국과 일본의 사회적기업 지원체계 및 지원방법 비교 연구
동북아 문화연구
2019 .06
-
사회적기업 사회적 성과의 영향요인 : 지방정부 공무원의 인식을 중심으로
사회과학연구논총
2018 .10
-
사회적기업의 성과분석에 관한 연구
대한경영학회지
2015 .07
-
사회적기업의 성장단계별 재정지원의 효과는 어떠한가? - 서울시 사회적기업 재정지원사업을 중심으로
한국사회복지행정학
2022 .08
-
Social Support Determines Consumer Performance of Environment-friendly Behaviors
Journal of Safety and Crisis Management
2020 .01
-
사회적기업의 사회적 영향 측정도구 개발
사회적가치와 기업연구
2020 .12
-
사회적 기업가정신이 조직성과에 미치는 영향 - 정부지원 조절효과를 중심으로 -
경영과 정보연구
2018 .01
-
The Analytic Framework of Social Policy
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2015 .02
-
북한의 노동복지법제 비교분석: 로동법과 외국인투자기업로동법을 중심으로
통일과 평화
2018 .01
-
한국 사회적기업의 실태분석을 통한 지원제도 개선에 관한 연구
한국창업학회지
2022 .09
-
정부지원이 사회적기업의 사회적 성과에 미치는 영향: 지역사회 이해관계자 간 인식 차이를 중심으로
한국사회과학연구
2023 .04
-
A Study on the Social Finance in Jeju
산경논집
2020 .01
-
독일에서 사회적 기업의 현황과 전망에 대한 연구
기업경영리뷰
2019 .01
-
Understanding the Relationship among Social Entrepreneurship, Management performance, and Social Performance: The Case of Nigeria
소비문화연구
2023 .06
-
지방자치단체의 사회적기업 지원정책 집행과 적극적 시민의식의 역할: ‘사회적기업제품 공공기관 우선구매제도’를 중심으로
현대사회와 행정
2023 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-000558392