지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.2
- 수록면
- 5 - 28 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : Representation in architecture is essential in that most of the design process is performed in representing media. Previous visualization studies have used questionnaires to reveal the relationship between the credibility of representation and high-level features (e.g., accuracy, realism, and abstraction) but had limited impact on the understanding of how people perceive and should produce representations.
Methods : In this study, eye-tracking data from six pairs of photographs and line drawing images were used to understand how representations affect people’s perceptions of architectural scenes. The impact of the educational background of the viewer and the sensitivity to a change in the given architectural scene was also investigated.
Results : Line drawing, relative to photography, was found to scatter and concentrate attention depending on the means of expression, to reduce the difference in attention between major/non-major groups, and to lessen the shift in attention according to scene changes because of the reduced contextual information.
Conclusions : While this study suggests how representational differences may be alleviated through technical means, we also argue that line drawing has a unique potential as a common cognitive ground for more open discussion.
Methods : In this study, eye-tracking data from six pairs of photographs and line drawing images were used to understand how representations affect people’s perceptions of architectural scenes. The impact of the educational background of the viewer and the sensitivity to a change in the given architectural scene was also investigated.
Results : Line drawing, relative to photography, was found to scatter and concentrate attention depending on the means of expression, to reduce the difference in attention between major/non-major groups, and to lessen the shift in attention according to scene changes because of the reduced contextual information.
Conclusions : While this study suggests how representational differences may be alleviated through technical means, we also argue that line drawing has a unique potential as a common cognitive ground for more open discussion.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Method
4. Results
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Usability of Assistive Technology: User Interface Design Guidelines for Powered Wheelchairs
Agnes Jihae Kim
,
Jong Bae Kim
,
O Seong Kweon
Archives of Design Research
2020
.05
Motion Photography’s Influences on Animated GIF
Seo
,
Ae Ri
,
Yang
외 1명
한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC 논문집
2021
.12
디자인과 HCI 분야의 국제 감성디자인 연구 경향에 대한 메타분석
신유리
,
박선엽
,
정주희
외 1명
Archives of Design Research
2020
.11
사용자 인지 경험 기반 모바일 광고 UX 디자인 연구
정혜수
,
유승헌
Archives of Design Research
2020
.08
The Reform Situation of Chinese Design Education in the 21st Century
Jinjing Liu
,
Ken Nah
Archives of Design Research
2020
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-658-000432789