지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.11
- 수록면
- 367 - 373 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Backgrounds/Aims: This study was conducted to verify and compare the safety and feasibility of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Methods: A total of 2,080 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single center, Konyang University Hospital, between 2010 and 2016. We retrospectively compared the demographics, perioperative outcome, and postoperative complication results between the CLC and SILC groups. Results: Among the 2,080 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 1,080 had CLC and 1,000 had SILC. When retrospectively reviewed, the SILC group had significantly higher percentages of patients who were aged under 80 years, who were women, and had the American Society of Anesthesiologist score of lower than 3 points compared to those of the CLC group. Furthermore, the CLC group had a higher percentage of patients with acute cholecystitis or empyema, whereas the SILC group had a higher percentage of patients with chronic cholecystitis. Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage insertion or H-vac insertion was more frequently conducted, bleeding loss was more common, and hospital stay was longer in the CLC group. Postoperative complications such as wound infection, biloma, bile duct injury, and duodenal perforation were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, if performed after preoperative patient selection such as in younger and female patients with no abdominal operation history at the time of benign gallbladder surgery, SILC can be considered feasible and safe without additional complications when compared with CLC.
목차
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .02
-
4-channel single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is superior to 3-channel SILC
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Outcome of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2023 .11
-
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with Mirizzi syndrome
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .02
-
Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .05
-
Single center experiences of needle-scopic grasper assisted single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder benign disease : comparison with conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .11
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Know-how of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Early complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
The effect of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy on systemic oxidative stress : a prospective clinical trial
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .04
-
Solo single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the parallel method; Surgical technique reducing a steep learning curve
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2019 .11
-
Comparison of Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy versus conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a single Center
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2023 .05
-
Evolution of the Konyang Standard Method for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy : the result from a thousand case of a single center experience
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .08
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using instrumental alignment in robotic single-site cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2018 .06
-
Comparison of the outcomes of robotic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .10
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2021 .12
-
Advantages of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy Compared to Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using a Propensity Score Matching
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy : History and overview
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Comparision of Single incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-514-000100972