메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Single center experiences of needle-scopic grasper assisted single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder benign disease : comparison with conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Tae-Seok Kim (Keimyung University School of Medicine) Kee-Hwan Kim (The Catholic University of Korea) Chang-Hyeok An (The Catholic University of Korea) Jeong-Soo Kim (The Catholic University of Korea)
Journal
The Korean Surgical Society Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.91 No.5 KCI Accredited Journals SCIE
Published
2016.11
Pages
233 - 238 (6page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Single center experiences of needle-scopic grasper assisted single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder benign disease : comparison with conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Research history (2)

  • Are you curious about the follow-up research of this article?
  • You can check more advanced research results through related academic papers or academic presentations.
  • Check the research history of this article

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Purpose: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has some technical problems. Our group has performed needlescopic grasper assisted SILC (nSILC) to overcome these problems. In this study, we introduce our technique and evaluate the safety and feasibility of this technique compared with the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
Methods: The medical records of 485 patients who received nSILC and CLC were reviewed retrospectively. Surgical outcomes including operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain and perioperative complication were compared between the 2 techniques.
Results: Although wound complications were developed more frequently in nSILC group, there was no significant difference between groups in other surgical outcomes. In subgroup analysis, surgical outcomes of nSILC were similar with those of CLC not only in easy group but also in difficult group.
Conclusion: It seems that nSILC is safe and feasible not only in selected patients but also in difficult cases such as acute cholecystitis.

Contents

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

View more

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-001565455