It's been more than 90 days since you changed your password. Please change your password to protect your privacy
When you visit DBpia through the library, login to SNS is restricted.
If you visit through the library, the URL will be different and you will not be able to log in to SNS due to kakao/google/naver policy. If you want to use your SNS account, please visit DBpia directly and log in.
This study was conducted in order to explore a variety of kindergarten teachers` experiences in the R-Learning acceptance process and the ways in which any problems that arose in the process were dealt with. To achieve the objectives, an in-depth interview survey of 12 teachers was conducted, and 128 concepts, 30 sub-categories and 12 categories were derived by following the approach procedures of a grounded theory. These categories were classified into: the cause and effect conditions(acceptance due to external factors and acceptance due to internal factors), major phenomenon(lack of confidence in accepting R-Learning), contextual conditions(lack of understanding pertaining to R-Learning, difficulty in the working environment, and limitations of the robot-application system), mediative conditions(the unique educational possibilities of R-Learning and desire for good results), action/interaction strategies(building of collaborative relationships, subjects` knowledge on R-Learning and their efforts in learning the program`s functions; re-consideration of stance toward R-Learning) and results(attempts for R-Learning application appropriate for class context). The paradigm model on the teachers` R-Learning experience was composed founded on the described data, and the characters and dimensions of each category were suggested. In the optional coding stage, the core category was drawn, which was ‘Striving to adapt R-Learning’, from which three types - namely, ‘Conflict type’, ‘Acceptance type’, and ‘Reflective type’ were further analyzed. In the results of this study, the process of the subjects` effort to adapt R-Learning into a feasible educational method was shown, and based on such, future directions for research and practices related to R-learning - its acceptance and expansion in the field of early childhood education were implied.
본 연구는 유치원 교사의 R-러닝 수용 과정에서의 경험과 어려움에 대처하는 과정을 탐색하고자 하는 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해 R-러닝을 활용하고 있는 교사 12명을 대상으로 심층면접을 실시하고, 근거이론에 따라 수집된 자료를 분석하여 최종적으로 128개의 개념과 30개의 하위범주 그리고 12개의 범주를 도출하였다. 범주들은 인과적 조건(외적 요인에 의한 수용, 내적 요인에 의한 수용), 중심현상(R-러닝 수용에 확신이 없음), 맥락적 조건(R-러닝에 대한 이해 부족, 업무 환경의 어려움, 로봇활용시스템의 한계), 중재적 조건(R-러닝만이 가능한 교육적 가능성, 잘하고 싶은 마음), 작용/상호작용 전략(협력관계의 구축, R-러닝에 대한 지식과 기능 학습 노력, R-러닝에 대한 태도 재고), 결과(수업상황에 적합하게 적용하기 위한 여러 시도를 함)로 나누어졌다. 이와 같은 분류 내용을 기초로 유치원 교사들의 R-러닝 사용경험에 대한 패러다임 모형을 구성하고 각 범주의 속성과 차원을 제시하였다. 선택코딩을 통해 핵심범주로 ‘R-러닝 수용을 위해 노력하기’ 를 도출하였으며, 이를 중심으로 ‘갈등형’, ‘순응형’, ‘반성형’의 세 가지 유형을 제시하였다. 본 연구결과는 유치원 교사들이 R-러닝을 수용하여 바람직한 실행으로 전환하기 위한 과정과 노력을 보여주며, 이를 기초로 추후 R-러닝의 수용 및 확산과 관련된 연구와 현장의 실행을 위한 시사점을 제시하고 있다.
You have been reported one after another from other members for writing reviews that contain advertisements, busive language, personal attacks, or disparaging expressions. As a result, you cannot write a review.