지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.5
- 수록면
- 15 - 22 (8page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2018.05.31.2.15
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : Additive manufacturing has the potential to disrupt conventional manufacturing. The argument presented in this article is that because product design students need to be achieving an advanced level of design for additive manufacturing to effectively utilise the technology in the near future, product design academics need to be researching the development of more advanced, discipline specific, learning objectives for designing to their constraints and opportunities. These need to address designing for complex technical applications and critically engage with implications for the future of design for manufacturing. The rationale underpinning this argument is based on a systematic quantitative literature review of research addressing design for additive manufacturing education.
Methods : The systematic quantitative literature review provides a survey view of a sample data-base (Scopus), focussing on peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers, and also analysis of two leading design research journals, Design Studies and Design Issues based on searches capturing data on additive manufacturing or 3D printing, product design and education. These were refined by date, authority (based on publication source) and relevance. The analysis provides an overview of the product design discipline’s response to the topic and highlights issues.
Results : An initial scoping search of the terms for title, abstract or keywords in Scopus identified 3720 published articles, from 2009–2017 rising each year: 59, 67, 84, 125, 192, 358, 666, 949, 1220. The data from a systematic quantitative literature review was analysed through the lens of sociotechnology theory, to foster a perspective on educational research at the intersection of technology and society. The results showed the majority of peer reviewed publications were written by engineering and architecture researchers, rather than product design academics (11%). Analysis of design publications showed an emphasis on 3D printing as a prototyping tool supporting other learning activities, rather than a focus in itself. A small proportion of publications advanced design for additive manufacturing education, both technically and in a broader economic, environmental and social context.
Conclusions : Overall, product design academics are not demonstrating the same level of engagement with research into additive manufacturing other discipline faculty members are, for example engineering and architectural. The implications are that a body of knowledge specific to product design is not being developed at the same pace and the potential disruption of design for manufacturing principles, practice and organization by additive manufacturing not yet addressed.
Methods : The systematic quantitative literature review provides a survey view of a sample data-base (Scopus), focussing on peer reviewed journal articles and conference papers, and also analysis of two leading design research journals, Design Studies and Design Issues based on searches capturing data on additive manufacturing or 3D printing, product design and education. These were refined by date, authority (based on publication source) and relevance. The analysis provides an overview of the product design discipline’s response to the topic and highlights issues.
Results : An initial scoping search of the terms for title, abstract or keywords in Scopus identified 3720 published articles, from 2009–2017 rising each year: 59, 67, 84, 125, 192, 358, 666, 949, 1220. The data from a systematic quantitative literature review was analysed through the lens of sociotechnology theory, to foster a perspective on educational research at the intersection of technology and society. The results showed the majority of peer reviewed publications were written by engineering and architecture researchers, rather than product design academics (11%). Analysis of design publications showed an emphasis on 3D printing as a prototyping tool supporting other learning activities, rather than a focus in itself. A small proportion of publications advanced design for additive manufacturing education, both technically and in a broader economic, environmental and social context.
Conclusions : Overall, product design academics are not demonstrating the same level of engagement with research into additive manufacturing other discipline faculty members are, for example engineering and architectural. The implications are that a body of knowledge specific to product design is not being developed at the same pace and the potential disruption of design for manufacturing principles, practice and organization by additive manufacturing not yet addressed.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. 3D printing publications
3. Curriculum development direction
4. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
[학술대회논문] - Chen, A. C. Y. / 2017 / Girls in Robot Class_Smart Textiles Interactive Tool-Kits to Enhance the Participatory of Women in Technology / International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies : 134 ~ 147
[단행본] - Decker, J. / 2014 / The Plastic Ocean / Booth-Clibborn
[단행본] - Diegel, O. / 2016 / Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing / Springer
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Du, J. / 2018 / Zero latency : Real time synchronization of BIM data in virtual reality for collaborative decision making / Automation in Construction 85 : 51 ~ 64
[인터넷자원] - Ford, S. / / 3D printing in teaching and education: A review of where and how it is used. Additive Manufacturing
[단행본] - Decker, J. / 2014 / The Plastic Ocean / Booth-Clibborn
[단행본] - Diegel, O. / 2016 / Handbook of Sustainability in Additive Manufacturing / Springer
[학술지(정기간행물)] - Du, J. / 2018 / Zero latency : Real time synchronization of BIM data in virtual reality for collaborative decision making / Automation in Construction 85 : 51 ~ 64
[인터넷자원] - Ford, S. / / 3D printing in teaching and education: A review of where and how it is used. Additive Manufacturing
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제조업 르네상스 시대의 제품 디자인 교육 2.0 -제품 디자인 프로세스 2.0을 중심으로-
Journal of Integrated Design Research
2019 .12
-
Viewpoint : Design and Engineering Convergence Education in a Korean and Australian Context
Archives of Design Research
2016 .05
-
디지털 제조산업에서 3D 프린팅기술 도입과 제품디자인 활용방안에 관한 연구
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017 .11
-
HOW TO DESIGN
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2024 .06
-
why new design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
-
DESIGN THINKING
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
My Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2019 .05
-
The Value of Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .05
-
Design
한국기초조형학회 작품집
2018 .11
-
Zero Design
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2018 .11
-
Market Analysis and the Future of Sustainable Design Using 3D Printing Technology
Archives of Design Research
2018 .02
-
3D 프린팅의 디자인 특성 연구 - 패션 관련분야 제품 사례분석을 바탕으로 -
조형디자인연구
2016 .01
-
Mapping the Characteristics of Design Research in Social Sciences
Archives of Design Research
2019 .11
-
Thoughts on the Future of Design
Archives of Design Research
2018 .05
-
Reshaping the Culture of Creativity in Design Education: A Case Study of Collaborative Design Project for the 2020 UN World Expo
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2020 .05
-
Understanding characteristics for designing future Product Service System (PSS)
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .11
-
디자인문화 확산을 위한 Social Design System 구축
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
A Systematic Review on Smart Manufacturing in the Garment Industry
한국의류산업학회지
2020 .01
-
Understanding Emotions and their Role in the Design of Products: An Integrative Review
Archives of Design Research
2021 .08
-
PRODUCT EXPERIENCE AND WELL-BEING : AN INTERACTIVE INTERPRETER FOR DIABETIC CHILDREN
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Development of morphing surface made by additive manufacturing and active friction control
Motoyuki Mu
,
ashima
,
Masato Kawaguchi
외 3명
한국트라이볼로지학회 학술대회
2018
.10
이종소재 금속 적층가공시 모재예열 효과에 따른 잔류응력 변화에 대한 연구
홍명표
,
성지현
,
김우성
외 4명
한국소성가공학회 학술대회 논문집
2018
.10
Construction of Programmable Drug Delivery System with Additive Manufacturing
명노현
,
강현욱
Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering
2018
.09
PBF방식으로 제조된 SUS316L 부품의 DED공정 보수 후 인장 특성 분석
오욱진
,
김민섭
,
이욱진
외 1명
한국소성가공학회 학술대회 논문집
2018
.05
Effect of Cooling Rate on Massive Phase Transformation in Additive Manufacturing Product Ti-6Al-4V by Selective Laser Beam Melting
G. Sup
,
obo
,
Sungwok Kim
외 1명
대한용접학회 특별강연 및 학술발표대회 개요집
2018
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0