메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Haeyeon Kim (Dept. of English)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제79호
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
135 - 158 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In cognitive linguistics, metaphor theory has been widely adopted in characterizing metaphorical use of many lexical words, claiming that figurative meanings can be explained in terms of the mapping between the terms in the target domain and those in the source domain. In recent years, Deignan (2005) claims that many metaphors proposed in MT should be supported or modified by empirical evidence deriving from corpus-based research (cf. Stefanowitsch & Gries 2006). Adopting this claim, the present research shows to what extent lexical items are metaphorical meanings, showing different degree of metaphoricity. More specifically, first, this study examines and compares the frequency rates of some lexical items such as body terms (meli ‘head’, kasum ‘chest/breast’, and tali ‘leg’), the synonymous words for fruit yelmay, kwail, and kwasil, and other concrete nouns such as kewul ‘mirror’ and ppwuli ‘root’ in the Sejong Corpus. Examination shows different degrees of the use of literal vs. non-literal meanings of the lexical items in question. Second, this research examines co-occurrence relations of the lexical items with predicates or modifying elements, showing examples of non-literal or figurative uses of the lexical items. Third, this research shows metaphors which are at work for the lexical items in question based on the examination of co-occurrence relations. Examination shows that many abstract notions in the target domains are expressed in terms of the concrete terms in the source domain, supporting the claim the figurative meanings are metaphorically extended meanings. In sum, this paper argues for the need of corpus-based research as empirical evidence for proper understanding and explaining the figurative meanings of lexical items.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Prior Studies and the Context of the Research
3. Database and Methods of the Research
4. Literal vs. Figurative Uses of Body-Part Terms: Meli ‘Head/Hair’, Kasum ‘Chest/Breast’, and Tali ‘Leg’
5. Literal vs. Figurative Uses of the Synonymous Lexical Items : Yelmay, Kwail, and Kwasil ‘Fruit’
6. Literal vs. Figurative Uses of Some Other Lexical Items : Kewul ‘Mirror’ and Ppwuli ‘Fruit’
7. Discussion, Summary, and Conclusion
References
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-710-001808231