메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이하나 (서울대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2018년 봄호(통권 제122호)
발행연도
2018.2
수록면
410 - 446 (39page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2018.02.122.410

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper’s goal is to understand North Korea’s present-day nationalism in part by showing how North Korea regarded the “nation”(minjok) and “culture” through the changes in its concept of “national culture”(minjok munhwa). North Korean nationalism grew stronger amid international variables such as competition with South Korea, a sense of crisis and opposition towards the US, differentiation from arising China post-Cold War, and Third World solidarity. Although early on North Korea strongly viewed the “nation” and nationalism negatively and aimed for an anti-chauvinist “national culture,” it later broke with the Stalinist concept of “nation” emphasizing economic community, transitioning to a concept of “nation” which valued blood ties and culture and emphasizing this concretely with the expression “national culture.” This latter concept was divided into “national cultural heritages”(minjok munhwa yusan) and “national cultural arts”(minjok munhwa yesul) since the founding of the North Korean regime. That is, national cultural heritages of the past were to be well preserved and passed on to create national cultural arts, and exceptional national cultural arts were to become great national cultural heritages in the future. The political struggles in the late 1950s and 1960s also constituted a battle of concepts surrounding “national culture,” where in various revolutionary traditions were renounced and Kim Il-Sung’s anti-Japanese resistance experience privileged over the others. With Kim’s sole leadership over North Korea fully established in 1967, national nihilism and reactionarism were strongly criticized during the theorization of “national culture” until the 1970s. The holding of many international events in Pyeongyang during the 1970s and 1980s was the result of North Korea’s self-awareness and pride in taking a leading role in Third World solidarity. Domestic and foreign crises and the country’s solitary hard line stance in the aftermath of the Cold War solidified North Korean nationalism, and concepts such as the “Chosun people first ideology” and the “people of Kim Ilsung,” and “Taedonggang culture” were produced as strategies to unify the regime in this atmosphere. In sum, the term “national culture” was an affective mechanism to preserve and unite the country in the face of national crises as well as a bastion of its self-esteem demonstrating the country’s existence.

목차

1. 서론: 북한에서 ‘민족’이란 무엇인가?
2. 1967년 이전 ‘민족문화’ 개념의 분화와 쟁투
3. 1967년 이후 ‘민족문화’ 개념의 정립과 변화
4. 결론: 다시, 북한에서 ‘민족문화’란 무엇인가?
참고문헌

참고문헌 (53)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0