지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.11
- 수록면
- 54 - 84 (31page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From self-driving cars to subprime mortgage-backed securities, innovation carries both risk, and opportunity. It also throws up profound regulatory challenges. As it evolves, innovation continually undermines, circumvents, and sidelines regulatory structures designed to accommodate it – no matter how sophisticated they may be.
This article is drawn from one chapter of Cristie Ford’s new book, Innovation and the State: Finance, Regulation, and Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017). The book examines the relationships between contemporary regulatory approaches, and private sector innovation. It then considers the implications of both for broader social welfare priorities including equality and voice. Using financial regulation as her primary example, Dr. Ford argues for a fresh approach to regulation, which recognizes innovation for the regulatory challenge that it is, and which binds our cherished social values and our regulatory tools ever more tightly together.
This chapter is entitled, “Sedimentary Innovation: Responding to Incremental Change.” It examines “sedimentary”, or incremental, innovation, which is the main way in which innovation actually develops in the real world. Sedimentary innovation is at the other end of the spectrum from “seismic,” or radical innovation, and it consists of incremental improvements based on imitation, tweaking, bricolage, and diffusion. Individually these moves seem innocuous, but collectively over time their effects can be enormous. Sedimentary innovation develops differently in different industry spaces, because it depends on its environmental conditions. In finance, the precise ways in which sedimentary innovation develops are shaped by forces including structural and social networks in the global financial industry, the importance of the first mover advantage, and pernicious collective action problems.
This chapter examines the ways in which sedimentary innovation presents a fundamental challenge to regulation. Like innovation generally, sedimentary innovation can profoundly undermine regulation across time. It can bury structures designed to contain it and transform the landscape, even while not seeming to be doing much at all. Sedimentary innovation is conceptually linked to the dominant contemporary regulatory approach, “flexible regulation,” but also presents challenges for it. For example, humans struggle to recognize sedimentary change in real time, due to cognitive limitations and bounded rationality. Regulatory boundary and coordination problems also pose unique problems in this context, as does the hindsight bias. After canvassing these challenges, the chapter concludes by offering some potential regulatory responses to the challenges that sedimentary innovation poses, including improving regulators’ analytic capacity, recognizing network effects and predictable cognitive limits, and building in institutional contrarians and system “breakers.”
Regulation is at the leading edge of policy in ways that we do not always fully grasp. Seemingly mundane regulatory design choices have profound, practical ramifications for our most cherished social commitments. This book argues that we need to recognize innovation, and financial innovation in particular, as a central challenge for regulation. Innovation is a complex phenomenon that needs to be understood not only in technical terms, but also in human ones. It can obscure and sideline our normative priorities. It can undermine the best-laid regulatory plans. By looking closely at contemporary regulatory strategies, the nature of innovation, and the relationships between the two, we can design regulation to better recognize and withstand innovation’s corrosive effects.
This article is drawn from one chapter of Cristie Ford’s new book, Innovation and the State: Finance, Regulation, and Justice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017). The book examines the relationships between contemporary regulatory approaches, and private sector innovation. It then considers the implications of both for broader social welfare priorities including equality and voice. Using financial regulation as her primary example, Dr. Ford argues for a fresh approach to regulation, which recognizes innovation for the regulatory challenge that it is, and which binds our cherished social values and our regulatory tools ever more tightly together.
This chapter is entitled, “Sedimentary Innovation: Responding to Incremental Change.” It examines “sedimentary”, or incremental, innovation, which is the main way in which innovation actually develops in the real world. Sedimentary innovation is at the other end of the spectrum from “seismic,” or radical innovation, and it consists of incremental improvements based on imitation, tweaking, bricolage, and diffusion. Individually these moves seem innocuous, but collectively over time their effects can be enormous. Sedimentary innovation develops differently in different industry spaces, because it depends on its environmental conditions. In finance, the precise ways in which sedimentary innovation develops are shaped by forces including structural and social networks in the global financial industry, the importance of the first mover advantage, and pernicious collective action problems.
This chapter examines the ways in which sedimentary innovation presents a fundamental challenge to regulation. Like innovation generally, sedimentary innovation can profoundly undermine regulation across time. It can bury structures designed to contain it and transform the landscape, even while not seeming to be doing much at all. Sedimentary innovation is conceptually linked to the dominant contemporary regulatory approach, “flexible regulation,” but also presents challenges for it. For example, humans struggle to recognize sedimentary change in real time, due to cognitive limitations and bounded rationality. Regulatory boundary and coordination problems also pose unique problems in this context, as does the hindsight bias. After canvassing these challenges, the chapter concludes by offering some potential regulatory responses to the challenges that sedimentary innovation poses, including improving regulators’ analytic capacity, recognizing network effects and predictable cognitive limits, and building in institutional contrarians and system “breakers.”
Regulation is at the leading edge of policy in ways that we do not always fully grasp. Seemingly mundane regulatory design choices have profound, practical ramifications for our most cherished social commitments. This book argues that we need to recognize innovation, and financial innovation in particular, as a central challenge for regulation. Innovation is a complex phenomenon that needs to be understood not only in technical terms, but also in human ones. It can obscure and sideline our normative priorities. It can undermine the best-laid regulatory plans. By looking closely at contemporary regulatory strategies, the nature of innovation, and the relationships between the two, we can design regulation to better recognize and withstand innovation’s corrosive effects.
목차
〈ABSTRACT〉
Ⅰ. What is “Sedimentary Innovation”?
Ⅱ. Sedimentary Innovation as Regulatory Opportunity and Regulatory Challenge
Ⅲ. Making Sense of Sedimentary Innovation
Ⅳ. Potential Regulatory Responses to Sedimentary Innovation
〈References〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
디지털금융 관련 정책의 입법론적 고찰과 규제혁신에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2022 .03
-
정부의 규제와 규제개선정책이 물류기업의 혁신 효율성에 미치는 영향 연구
서비스경영학회지
2021 .09
-
호텔기업의 자원지향성이 혁신활동과 경영성과에미치는 영향에 관한 연구
관광경영연구
2018 .01
-
한국중소기업의 기술혁신 목적 중요도가 혁신성과에 미치는 영향요인: 수도권과 비수도권의 개방형협력 활동의 매개효과를 중심으로
한일경상논집
2021 .11
-
기술혁신과 규제 개혁 정책이 신산업 분야의 기업성과에 미치는 영향 분석 - 한국형 규제샌드박스의 조절효과를 중심으로-
규제연구
2023 .12
-
Leading Open Innovation
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
기업혁신의 영향요인과 혁신성과에 관한 연구
국제회계연구
2021 .08
-
China's Innovation-Driven Development Strategy and Prospects
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2016 .12
-
기술혁신이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 연구 : 마케팅혁신, 조직혁신의 매개효과를 중심으로
기업경영연구
2021 .10
-
규제의 영향 인식과 혁신 활동과의 연관성 분석 : 규제의 유형에 따른 차이를 중심으로
규제연구
2020 .12
-
한국 서비스기업들의 혁신에 대한 실증적 분석
서비스경영학회지
2016 .03
-
The Effect of Regulations on Technology Innovation: The Case of Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2024 .12
-
혁신의 정의와 발생구조 및 이론체계에 근거한 교육조직 혁신 발전방향 탐색
교육행정학연구
2020 .06
-
수출기업의 혁신활동, 혁신성과, 경영성과 간의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2021 .10
-
IT산업의 기술혁신 목적 중요도 및 성과에 관한 연구 : IPA 기법을 중심으로
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2017 .06
-
Innovation and Economic Growth: Review of Korean Firms' Innovation Performance
[BOK] Korea Economic Outlook
2024 .07
-
Perspectives on Innovations and Development
Seoul Journal of Economics
2016 .01
-
춘추전국시대와 개방형 혁신
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
금융혁신과 금융안정
한국경제포럼
2019 .01
-
혁신적 기업 육성을 위한 기술혁신효율성 분석과 영향 요인에 관한 연구
무역연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0