지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第140輯
- 발행연도
- 2017.9
- 수록면
- 87 - 117 (31page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2017.09.140.87
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Under the so-called Ming order in premodern East Asia, which lasted for about 250 years from the turn of the 1400s and the early 1700s, there were big differences between the 1400s and the 1500s in the features of the Sino-Korean relations. In the 1400s, sadae (事大), which means serving a bigger country, inferred a sort of utilitarian and contractual relations with the Ming, implying that the suzerain state could be replaced anytime depending on the political situation. In the early 1600s, however, this trend began to change to unconditional relations based on Confucian moral values in which the Koreans viewed the Ming as a ritual father as well as the suzerain. The reasons for this change can be approached from several perspectives, including Chungjong"s submissive attitude toward the Ming in order to secure his throne by borrowing the Ming authority, the spread of the consciousness of Little China (小中華) and the sinocentric world view, and a new Korean mindset in which obedience to Ming China was regarded as natural law, like the yin-yang and father-son relations.
With emphasis on such differences, this article is aimed to provide a new approach to the Sino-Korean relations, focusing on the 1500s, from diverse perspectives, not only political aspects but also intellectual ones. In the 1500s, the relations were based on the practical interests of the two countries in non-economic profits such as national security and sharing Confucian knowledge and values. In the 1500s, however, the Ming-Chosŏn relations gradually yet steadily evolved into a new relation based on Confucian ideology. In the 1500s, for example, a new obligation such as father-son relations was added to the preexisting obligation like lord-subject relations. This change implies that Ming China was now the father of Chosŏn Korea as well as the lord, suggesting that the Chosŏn relied much more heavily on Ming China. At the same time, however, the ruling elites of Chosŏn did not follow Ming China blindly; for example, they tended to somewhat look down the current systems of Ming China in the fields of culture and Confucian values.
With this critical view of the Sino-Korean relations in the 1500s, this article looks at the two different aspects of the Sino-Korean relations. One was the lord-subject and father-son relations in terms of political and military aspects. Going against such visible politico-military relations, the other was the somewhat underground stream, in which Korean ruling elites never hesitated to reject the Wang Yangming Learning for their own interests as a existing-powered ruling status. This article examines such dual structure of the Sino-Korean relations in the 1500s from an ideological perspective.
With emphasis on such differences, this article is aimed to provide a new approach to the Sino-Korean relations, focusing on the 1500s, from diverse perspectives, not only political aspects but also intellectual ones. In the 1500s, the relations were based on the practical interests of the two countries in non-economic profits such as national security and sharing Confucian knowledge and values. In the 1500s, however, the Ming-Chosŏn relations gradually yet steadily evolved into a new relation based on Confucian ideology. In the 1500s, for example, a new obligation such as father-son relations was added to the preexisting obligation like lord-subject relations. This change implies that Ming China was now the father of Chosŏn Korea as well as the lord, suggesting that the Chosŏn relied much more heavily on Ming China. At the same time, however, the ruling elites of Chosŏn did not follow Ming China blindly; for example, they tended to somewhat look down the current systems of Ming China in the fields of culture and Confucian values.
With this critical view of the Sino-Korean relations in the 1500s, this article looks at the two different aspects of the Sino-Korean relations. One was the lord-subject and father-son relations in terms of political and military aspects. Going against such visible politico-military relations, the other was the somewhat underground stream, in which Korean ruling elites never hesitated to reject the Wang Yangming Learning for their own interests as a existing-powered ruling status. This article examines such dual structure of the Sino-Korean relations in the 1500s from an ideological perspective.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 상호 인식
Ⅲ. 정치적 성격
Ⅳ. 경제적 성격
Ⅴ. 사상·문화적 성격
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 계승범 / 2006 / 파병 논의를 통해 본 조선전기 對明觀의 변화 / 대동문화연구 (53) : 309 ~ 346
[단행본] - 계승범 / 2009 / 조선시대 해외파병과 한중관계: 조선 지배층의 중국 인식 / 푸른역사
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 계승범 / 2009 / 한국의 유교화와 17세기: 도이힐러의 『한국 사회의 유교적 변환』과 그 해석 / 韓國史學史學報 (20) : 179 ~ 205
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 계승범 / 2012 / 임진왜란 중 조명관계의 실상과 조공책봉관계의 본질 / 韓國史學史學報 (26) : 117 ~ 145
[단행본] - 계승범 / 2014 / 중종의 시대: 조선의 유교화와 사림운동 / 역사비평사
[단행본] - 계승범 / 2009 / 조선시대 해외파병과 한중관계: 조선 지배층의 중국 인식 / 푸른역사
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 계승범 / 2009 / 한국의 유교화와 17세기: 도이힐러의 『한국 사회의 유교적 변환』과 그 해석 / 韓國史學史學報 (20) : 179 ~ 205
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 계승범 / 2012 / 임진왜란 중 조명관계의 실상과 조공책봉관계의 본질 / 韓國史學史學報 (26) : 117 ~ 145
[단행본] - 계승범 / 2014 / 중종의 시대: 조선의 유교화와 사림운동 / 역사비평사
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝鮮王朝“三唐”詩人的宗唐詩風與元明詩學
열상고전연구
2015 .08
-
임진왜란 초기 조명 군사 협력의 양상 - 벽제관 전투 전후를 중심으로 -
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
五山禪僧의 對中國 집단학습활동을 통한 관련 지식 축적 및 인식 전파에 관한 연구(3)- 글로 배운 중국, 目睹한 중국 -
인문학연구
2024 .09
-
위기에서의 선택 — 한국전쟁에 대한 중국의 정책 결정 논평 —
중국근현대사연구
2022 .03
-
임진왜란 전반기 조선의 對명 전략
역사와실학
2018 .08
-
몽골 제국의 유산으로서의 조명관계(朝明關係)와 중화주의 문제 재고(再考)
역사학보
2022 .12
-
Nurhaci in Korean Sources, 1594-1622
International Journal of Korean History
2016 .02
-
교과서에 기술된 양명학의 실태 분석 및 개선을 위한 제언 - 고등학교 『윤리와 사상』 교과서를 중심으로 -
양명학
2020 .03
-
임진왜란 전반기 조선의 남병(南兵) 인식과 활용 방안
한국사연구
2020 .06
-
Liu Yi’s Surrender to the Ming and the Nature of Goryeo Missions to the Ming Dynasty
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2022 .06
-
觀念的流動 -朝鮮宗唐詩風興起與明人復古思潮之關聯-
연민학지
2024 .02
-
강화양명학 국제학술대회 분석을 통해본 하곡학 연구 현황과 전망
유학연구
2019 .01
-
조선 성리학자들의 양명학에 대한 비판적 인식 검토(4) - 박세채의 ｢왕양명학변｣을 중심으로 -
유학연구
2020 .01
-
15세기 후반 조선의 서북면 방어와 명의 遼東 진출
역사와 담론
2018 .07
-
아베-시진핑 이후 중일관계의 변화 중일 간 정치 갈등은 경제관계에 어떤 영향을 미쳤는가?
일본연구
2022 .12
-
양명학 교육 방안 연구
한국양명학회 학술대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
명대 변려문의 전개와 조선으로의 유전-弘嘉 연간 강남의 吳中文人을 중심으로
中國散文硏究集刊
2023 .06
-
조선의 對일 전략에 대한 일고찰 : 일본군의 남해안 철수 직후(1593.07~1594.02)를 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2021 .11
-
[조선 전기] 조선전기사 연구의 현황과 과제(2015~2016)
역사학보
2017 .09
-
명 · 청 교체기 대명 사신과 거주민의 교류 - 최현의 『조천일록』을 중심으로 -
한국문학과 예술
2022 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-910-001342010