지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Europeans at, least have developed the laws and institutions, during half a century. They have developed a common security model and their CSCE/ OSCE approach to multilateralism is contributing to the management of military threats and security challenges in Europe. The effectiveness of any conflict management strategy is how to move smoothly and expeditiously from early warning to early action. Sometimes, the process of the consensus of the OSCE decisions requires patience and effort to remove objections and to persuade all the concerned states not to block the decision. It often slows down the decision-making process, but it is essential in order to secure political support for the action from all the participating states. That is why, as far as general policies and guidelines are concerned on the CSCE/OSCE approach, the energy spent on building consensus is an investment which pays off well. In this sense, we can find in the CSCE/ OSCE the merit of multilateral security regime for the prevention of conflict in a region. The end of the Cold War in Europe has undoubtedly influenced the security environment in the Asia-Pacific Region and especially in Northeast Asia. Today, it is not difficult to recognize a growing sense that regional security cooperation has received serious attention among scholars and leaders of the various states in the region. The fall of the Soviet Union, doubts about the future role of the United States, concern about a potential future conflict with the emerging powers of China and Japan and the threat of the long ranged-missiles of North Korea, combines with reasons to find the means for consultations on regional political and security issues in Northeast Asia. Despite these uncertainties and many obstacles in developing regional multilateral and cooperative security regimes, enforcing the study on the OSCE as multilateral security regime, we need to our efforts to build mutual trust in security by developing ARF, CSCAP, NEACD and NEASED in this region.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동북아 군비경쟁과 안보협력
한국사회과학연구
2009 .06
-
Multilateral Security in the Regional Regime : A study on the case of the CSCE/OSCE
한국사회과학연구
1998 .12
-
동북아 안보레짐 형성연구 : OSCE의 경험을 중심으로
사회과학연구
2004 .02
-
The Experience of the CSCE/OSCE: Its Implications for the Establishment of a Multilateral Security Regime in Northeast Asia
유럽연구
2004 .06
-
안보레짐의 형성 : CSCE/OSCE의 사례연구
국제정치논총
1998 .09
-
동북아 다자안보체제 구축과 선결조건
세계지역연구논총
2010 .01
-
다자안보협력의 제도화 경로 : C/OSCE의 경험과 동북아 적용 방안 연구
국제정치논총
2009 .06
-
OSCE의 동아시아 지역 적용가능성과 문제점
유럽연구
2002 .12
-
다자간 안보레짐의 한계: 탈냉전기 유럽 안보협력에 대한 신자유제도주의적 접근
한국군사학논집
2012 .02
-
노무현 행정부의 동북아 다자안보협력체제 구상과 그 실현 가능성
한국동북아논총
2006 .12
-
Energy Security in Northeast Asia
Global Asia
2006 .09
-
유럽안보협력기구의 ‘포괄적 안보’ 전략과 소수민족 문제 - 소수민족담당고등판무관의 예방외교 활동의 기능적, 규범적 평가 -
EU연구
2020 .01
-
Confidence- and Security-Building Measures (CSBMs) in the Modern Context: The European Experience
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2008 .01
-
북한 핵문제와 다자주의적 접근의 유용성
국제정치연구
2010 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-030-001515541