지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.5
- 수록면
- 725 - 770 (46page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper suggests ways to prepare reunification of Korean peninsula by understanding the flow of the changes in North Korean real estate market by resolving the three concerns regarding the right to housing.
Firstly, there is a change in the housing policy from the North Korean authorities. North Korean government used to focus on the assurance and regulation of the right to housing, but since 2009, it has been paying keen attention to the housing fees by enacting the housing act and the real estate control law.
North Korea has been assigning the housing to its people since implementation of the ground rules for the right to housing in ‘North Korea Constitution of 1972’ and ‘North Korea Civil Law of 1990’. However, the housing transactions has become more vitalized despite of its efforts to control the order of utilization of housing and buildings through establishment of various regulations after observing the dramatic increase in covert transactions on housing rights in 1990s.
In addition, there is a direct correlation between the collapse of the national rationing system and vitalization of the real estate construction market triggered by active housing transactions. The collapse of rationing system in North Korea was due to the purchase, transportation and distribution system failing to operate normally after the death of Kim, Ilsung in July 1994. Having its successors fail to control the chaos in rationing system led to the North Korean government’s economic ruling function to follow the market principle.
North Korean residents, who could not be supplied by the government for their food and the daily necessities, obtained what they need from the farmers market which eventually invigorated the market system. The government attempted to control the farmers market, but as they still could not normalize the national distribution system, it officially converted the farmers market to general market, and since then, the market has become the mainstay of North Korean economy system.
Meanwhile, the housing transactions have only gotten more dynamic as the demand for the housing near terminal or markets increases. However, note that housing transaction in North Korea is illegal, and therefore subject to punishment. As such, real estate brokers colluding with the authorities started resolving the administrative procedures for housing transactions which led to individual capitalists conspiring with government officials and authorities to enable development of the real estate market by constructing, rebuilding and redeveloping the private houses and apartments.
Lastly, there is a shift in social perception and economic change in North Korea sprang from the speculative investment market in real estates combined with private capitals which is all initiated by transacting the right to housing. Also, there are alternatives to stabilize the housing market sought by considering the perception of people in North Korea in case of the sudden reunification.
The development of real estate market formed the newly rich in North Korea and the new class with power protecting them. This forewarns of the possibility of change in social structure where the social status based on the capital strength replaces the status traditionally given by loyalty and ancestry.
Private accumulation of capital is allowed in North Korea as much as the private property is legal. Although the title to personal housing (mostly in form of apartment) does not receive legal recognition yet, the private ownership is accepted as market economy develops. The ownership of private houses acquired from the existing real estate market cannot be denied by the mere logic laid on the concept of housing fees. In the same manner, this paper is concluded with the suggestion of the current legal character of home ownership in North Korea to be immediately converted from the right to housing to the ownership.
Firstly, there is a change in the housing policy from the North Korean authorities. North Korean government used to focus on the assurance and regulation of the right to housing, but since 2009, it has been paying keen attention to the housing fees by enacting the housing act and the real estate control law.
North Korea has been assigning the housing to its people since implementation of the ground rules for the right to housing in ‘North Korea Constitution of 1972’ and ‘North Korea Civil Law of 1990’. However, the housing transactions has become more vitalized despite of its efforts to control the order of utilization of housing and buildings through establishment of various regulations after observing the dramatic increase in covert transactions on housing rights in 1990s.
In addition, there is a direct correlation between the collapse of the national rationing system and vitalization of the real estate construction market triggered by active housing transactions. The collapse of rationing system in North Korea was due to the purchase, transportation and distribution system failing to operate normally after the death of Kim, Ilsung in July 1994. Having its successors fail to control the chaos in rationing system led to the North Korean government’s economic ruling function to follow the market principle.
North Korean residents, who could not be supplied by the government for their food and the daily necessities, obtained what they need from the farmers market which eventually invigorated the market system. The government attempted to control the farmers market, but as they still could not normalize the national distribution system, it officially converted the farmers market to general market, and since then, the market has become the mainstay of North Korean economy system.
Meanwhile, the housing transactions have only gotten more dynamic as the demand for the housing near terminal or markets increases. However, note that housing transaction in North Korea is illegal, and therefore subject to punishment. As such, real estate brokers colluding with the authorities started resolving the administrative procedures for housing transactions which led to individual capitalists conspiring with government officials and authorities to enable development of the real estate market by constructing, rebuilding and redeveloping the private houses and apartments.
Lastly, there is a shift in social perception and economic change in North Korea sprang from the speculative investment market in real estates combined with private capitals which is all initiated by transacting the right to housing. Also, there are alternatives to stabilize the housing market sought by considering the perception of people in North Korea in case of the sudden reunification.
The development of real estate market formed the newly rich in North Korea and the new class with power protecting them. This forewarns of the possibility of change in social structure where the social status based on the capital strength replaces the status traditionally given by loyalty and ancestry.
Private accumulation of capital is allowed in North Korea as much as the private property is legal. Although the title to personal housing (mostly in form of apartment) does not receive legal recognition yet, the private ownership is accepted as market economy develops. The ownership of private houses acquired from the existing real estate market cannot be denied by the mere logic laid on the concept of housing fees. In the same manner, this paper is concluded with the suggestion of the current legal character of home ownership in North Korea to be immediately converted from the right to housing to the ownership.
목차
〈국문요약〉
Ⅰ. 들어가기
Ⅱ. 북한의 살림집 정책과 공급의 한계
Ⅲ. 살림집이용권 거래시장의 형성과 발전
Ⅳ. 북한 건설시장의 발전이 통일에 미치는 영향
Ⅴ. 나가기
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (64)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
헌법재판소 1999. 7. 22. 선고 97헌바76,98헌바50·51·52·54·55(병합) 전원재판부
가. 헌법재판소법 제68조 제2항에 의한 헌법소원은 법률의 위헌여부심판의 제청신청을 하여 그 신청이 기각된 때에만 청구할 수 있는 것이다. 그런데 청구인 홍성민 등은 …… 구 공유수면매립법 제6조 제2호에 대하여는 위헌여부심판의 제청신청을 한 바 없고, 이에 따라 이 부분에 대하여는 법원의 위헌제청신청기각결정도 없었다. 따라서 위 법률조항에
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도시공간을 고려한 주택하위시장의 구조화에 관한 연구
주거환경
2017 .06
-
서울시 주택시장의 변화특성과 정책과제
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .09
-
외부수요가 주택가격에 미치는 영향 분석 - 광주광역시 아파트를 중심으로 -
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2019 .10
-
부산시 주택하위시장의 세분화 및 특성에 관한 연구
부동산학연구
2015 .01
-
An Exploratory Study on the Distribution and Marketing Changes Under the North Korean System
산경연구논집
2020 .01
-
Theoretical Reflections on Housing Policy and Housing Markets in South Korea: Focusing on the 1960s to 1990s
한국도시지리학회지
2024 .08
-
주거서비스 관계법령 운영 현황 분석 및 문제점 도출 연구
주거환경
2024 .12
-
라이프스타일에 따른 아파트 주거선호 특성요인에 관한 연구 : 부산시를 중심으로
주거환경
2017 .12
-
북한 부동산 가치변화와 개발에 관한 연구 －평양을 중심으로－
동북아경제연구
2018 .01
-
통일 후 북한지역 주택의 소유 및 관리에 관한 입법방향
집합건물법학
2022 .05
-
Market Prices in North Korea: 2006~2022
[BOK] Working paper
2024 .01
-
북한보험제도의 변화와 전망: 현지답사결과를 중심으로
아태비즈니스연구
2023 .06
-
금융시장지수의 한국주택시장 적용성에 관한 연구
경영과학
2020 .06
-
지역 주거특성에 따른 주거환경 만족도에 관한 연구 : 경남지역을 중심으로
주거환경
2017 .06
-
A Look at Real Life in North Korea
Global Asia
2015 .03
-
주거기본법의 제정과 주거권, 그 함의
공법연구
2016 .06
-
전국 주택구매력지수(HAI)의 변화가 지방 주택매매시장에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
주거환경
2023 .03
-
북한주택의 사유화 이후 임차인 보호방향
아주법학
2016 .01
-
부동산 뉴스와 주택경기의 동적 관계에 대한 고찰: 언론보도논조지수 개발을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2021 .03
-
정부의 주택정책과 시장특성이 주택구매의향에 미치는 영향 연구 - 서울시를 중심으로 -
주거환경
2020 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북한의 민족주의와 문화변용 : 김정은 시대 북한 문화의 변화
정영철
문화정책논총
2017
.08
북한 스케치 : 2000년대 신문 빅 데이터에 표상된 북한의 모습
김일환
,
이도길
,
강진웅
현대북한연구
2017
.08
2000년 이후 북한 가족생활문화의 변화
진미정
,
김상하
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2017
.05
김정일 시대 북한 민족주의의 진화 : <주체성과 민족성>과 <민족주의에 대하여>를 중심으로
강혜석
국제정치연구
2020
.03
정당성의 정치와 북한의 민족재건설 : 주체, 우리 식, 우리민족제일주의
강혜석
다문화사회연구
2017
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0