지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This treatise aims at explaining about the value of ‘‘노화비’(reed broom)’ which had been made at the province of Gangseo in Busan as isolated region. Nowadays in Korea, it is naturally accepted that a intangible cultural asset which has typicality of nation is recommended for registered remains recognized by UNESCO. However, some intangible cultural asset which has local feature and made by local residents at province for a long time has its own value to be regarded as UNESCO cultural remains.
This treatise tries to search the history and the process that the reed broom has been made and used at Gangseo in isolated circumstance. Though long history had flowed at this region from 7thousand years ago, the position of this region had not been independent. Therefore its belonging had changed many times, especially after early 1970s when Busan tried to develope and expand its territory to get multiple functions as metropolis. With such trends, Gangseo was forced to be the part and the outskirt of Busan, and the residents of this region were also forced to live following to belonged lives. The distinct changes were occurred with such attempts of Busan for example housing, building factories and urban construction project. According to such changes, many traditional villages were disappeared at Gangseo where residents had lived painfully in barren surroundings because of lack traffic facilities, floods and insufficiency of drinking water & foods etc. In such situation, the craft work making reed bloom had been good industry for residents to get profits to live, at the same time, it had been also regarded as art craft works. The reed blooms made at Gangseo had been sold and spread to all over the provinces of nation. It had been commonly used as a tool for sweeping, hwever some people had owned and kept it as trinkets. So some people living at Gangseo usually says “The breed bloom is excellent art and the skill of craft work is just cultural heritage.” At the result, the reed broom has such value to be regarded as a symbol of overcoming difficulties of lives, therefore also as a intangible cultural asset.
This treatise tries to search the history and the process that the reed broom has been made and used at Gangseo in isolated circumstance. Though long history had flowed at this region from 7thousand years ago, the position of this region had not been independent. Therefore its belonging had changed many times, especially after early 1970s when Busan tried to develope and expand its territory to get multiple functions as metropolis. With such trends, Gangseo was forced to be the part and the outskirt of Busan, and the residents of this region were also forced to live following to belonged lives. The distinct changes were occurred with such attempts of Busan for example housing, building factories and urban construction project. According to such changes, many traditional villages were disappeared at Gangseo where residents had lived painfully in barren surroundings because of lack traffic facilities, floods and insufficiency of drinking water & foods etc. In such situation, the craft work making reed bloom had been good industry for residents to get profits to live, at the same time, it had been also regarded as art craft works. The reed blooms made at Gangseo had been sold and spread to all over the provinces of nation. It had been commonly used as a tool for sweeping, hwever some people had owned and kept it as trinkets. So some people living at Gangseo usually says “The breed bloom is excellent art and the skill of craft work is just cultural heritage.” At the result, the reed broom has such value to be regarded as a symbol of overcoming difficulties of lives, therefore also as a intangible cultural asset.
목차
서론
본론1 주변화에 따른 지역의 변모
본론2 주변부 무형문화유산의 소멸
결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역의 주변화와 무형문화유산의 소멸 : 부산 강서지역 ‘노화비’의 경우
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
중국의 무형문화유산 보호에 관한 법제 연구
법이론실무연구
2022 .11
-
상장기업 무형자산 시장가치 측정 및 영향요인 분석: 지분이 인수된 기업을 중심으로
경영학연구
2020 .12
-
중국 무형문화유산제도의 형성과 정책관리체계 연구
한국자치행정학보
2015 .01
-
외식기업의 무형자산과 기업 실적과의 관련성에 관한 연구
관광레저연구
2016 .02
-
외식기업에서 무형자산 투자와 경영성과
관광경영연구
2019 .01
-
무형자산과 무형자산성 지출이 기업가치에 미치는 영향：코스닥시장을 중심으로
세무회계연구
2021 .12
-
유네스코, 국가, 지방정부 - 중국 연변조선족자치주의 사례를 통해 살펴본 유네스코 무형문화유산 제도의 지역적 적용 -
동북아 문화연구
2021 .06
-
공진화를 통한 무형문화유산의 보존과 활용을 위한 지속가능성 연구
인문사회 21
2022 .06
-
국가무형문화재 범주 운용에 대한 개선 방안 연구
문화정책논총
2018 .12
-
무형문화유산 기록화와 전수교육관에 대한 연구
기록학연구
2018 .01
-
엔터테인먼트산업의 무형자산과 가치관련성
세무회계연구
2024 .09
-
Do Reported Intangible Assets Create a Better Information Environment?
Global Business and Finance Review
2024 .05
-
중소기업의 글로벌화 방안에 관한 연구:무형자산을 중심으로
글로벌경영학회지
2015 .09
-
핵심무형자산의 개념과 측정 및 보고
회계저널
2020 .01
-
남한 무형문화유산과 북한 비물질문화유산의 개념과 제도의 정책 변화 분석
문화정책논총
2022 .12
-
알렌컬렉션 황실문화재 관광자원 활성화방안
한국서비스경영학회 학술대회
2017 .11
-
무형문화유산 보호를 위한 민간 지역조사 활동의 비판적 검토와 나아갈 방향 : 무형유산지기 활동을 중심으로
지역사회연구
2016 .03
-
From Factories to Ideas: Why Intangible Capital Matters for the Korean Economy
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2025 .03
-
정조대왕능행차의유네스코 인류무형문화유산 등재 추진방안 연구
정책연구
2020 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-910-002391519