메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국아동학회 아동학회지 아동학회지 제5권
발행연도
1984.12
수록면
3 - 20 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper was to review critiques on methodological problems relating to Piaget`s researches in terms of its scientific nature. On the basis of review of literature. the following problems were pointed out: 1. Notwithstanding Piaget`s emphasis on the scientific requirement for verification, Piaget was against the deductive method typical of scientific verification. 2. Piaget`s theory was so vague that It couldn`t be falsified. 3. Piaget ignored criticism of his method, and this was viewed as unscientific in the eyes of most scientists. 4. Avoiding the antecedent-consequence sequence of scientific experimentation, Piaget took the descriptive rather than the explanative nature. 5. Piaget didn`t accept individual differences in cognitive style in his research paradigm. 6. Piaget`s experimental procedures looked very simple but they were too complex to understand what was happening. 7. Although Piaget`s major ideas treated the child as the active constructor of reality, the child`s experimental tasks were structured by experimenter. 8. Piaget`s clinical method depended heavily upon language although the procedures required manipulation of objects. 9. Piaget always justified his experiments in terms of protocols selected from all the responses obtained. However, these protocols may not be the most representative responses or behaviors showing the child`s cognitive structure.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-598-002112498