지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.91 No.5
- 발행연도
- 2016.11
- 수록면
- 219 - 225 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: With the increase in the average life expectancy, the elderly population continues to increase rapidly. However, no consensus has been reached on the feasibility for surgical resection due to the high morbidity and mortality rate after surgical treatment in elderly patients caused by aging and underlying diseases.
Methods: This study was performed with patients aged 80 years and older. The subjects were classified into 2 groups as follows: the surgical resection group consisting of 61 patients, and the conservative treatment group consisting of 39 patients suitable for curative resection.
Results: Mean age and clinical stages in the conservative treatment group were higher than those in the surgical resection group. There was no significant difference in sex, location of the lesion, histological type, or underlying disease. The mean survival time of surgical resection group and conservative treatment group was respectively 52.1 ± 2.66 months and 37.1 ± 5.08 months (P < 0.05) for clinical stage 1 disease, 41.7 ± 5.16 months and 22.4 ± 6.07 months (P = 0.004) for stage 2 disease, and 31.7 ± 9.37 months and 10.6 ± 1.80 months (P = 0.049) for stage 3 disease. However, as for the extent of lymph node resection for the different stages, we observed no significant difference between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Surgical resection in all clinical stages, except stage 4, showed a higher survival rate than conservative treatment. To minimize postoperative surgery complications, limited lymph node dissection should also be considered.
Methods: This study was performed with patients aged 80 years and older. The subjects were classified into 2 groups as follows: the surgical resection group consisting of 61 patients, and the conservative treatment group consisting of 39 patients suitable for curative resection.
Results: Mean age and clinical stages in the conservative treatment group were higher than those in the surgical resection group. There was no significant difference in sex, location of the lesion, histological type, or underlying disease. The mean survival time of surgical resection group and conservative treatment group was respectively 52.1 ± 2.66 months and 37.1 ± 5.08 months (P < 0.05) for clinical stage 1 disease, 41.7 ± 5.16 months and 22.4 ± 6.07 months (P = 0.004) for stage 2 disease, and 31.7 ± 9.37 months and 10.6 ± 1.80 months (P = 0.049) for stage 3 disease. However, as for the extent of lymph node resection for the different stages, we observed no significant difference between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Surgical resection in all clinical stages, except stage 4, showed a higher survival rate than conservative treatment. To minimize postoperative surgery complications, limited lymph node dissection should also be considered.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Resection first
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
조기 위암의 내시경 치료 후 불완전 절제 시의 대책
대한의사협회지
2022 .05
-
Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2015 .02
-
Hepatic resection for isolated stomach cancer liver metastases: A single-center experience
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2019 .12
-
Single Institute Hepatic Resection for Elderly Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Short- Term Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Hepatic resection for isolated breast cancer liver metastasis : A single-center experience
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2017 .12
-
Analysis of Differences in Clinical Outcome after Surgical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinomas by the Periods
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Palliative resection of a primary tumor in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer : could resection type improve survival?
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2016 .10
-
Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of combined major vessel resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .11
-
Simultaneous Major Liver Resection and Colon Cancer Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Comparative study of Laparoscopic Liver Resection and Open Liver Resection in Patients over 70 years of age.
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Is Radical Surgery Necessary for All Patients Diagnosed as Having Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection?
Clinical Endoscopy
2019 .01
-
Comparison of surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with additional radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
2018 .01
-
A Recent Argument for the Use of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancers
Gut and Liver
2020 .01
-
The Benefits of Resection for Gastric Carcinoma Patients with Non-curative Factors
전남의대학술지
2018 .01
-
Prognosis after resection for lung metastasis after curative resection for colorectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .05
-
Cavernous Malformations at Optic Apparatus: Three Cases
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
2018 .01
-
Risk Stratification of T1 Colorectal Cancer Metastasis to Lymph Nodes: Current Status and Perspective
Gut and Liver
2021 .11
-
A Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer with Lymphoid Stroma
Journal of Gastric Cancer
2018 .12
-
Focus on Endoscopic Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-514-001565435