메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제23권 제4호
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
243 - 251 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of KPGA tour golf players’ pre-shot routine time consistency regarding skill level. Theorizing based on sport psychology literatures, we pay attention to psychological traits of functional routine consistency and further investigate to contribute in improving golfers’ skill level. Methods. In order to achieve this research objectives, we selected 9 high professional skill level players and 15 low professional skill level players based on the 2012 prize money ranking provided by KPGA Association as of 2013. Researchers have measured pre-shot routine time for the tee shot, second shot and putting of each player in every hole in the first round of golfers`` tournament competition in which their average skill level were obtained. We analyzed 2 professional skill level group data using t-test technique. Results. Our empirical findings indicate that the consistency of a pre-shot routine time of the tee shot have shown to be significantly different between high skill level and low skill level professional golfer groups. On the other hand, there were no significant differences regarding the consistency of the second shot and putting pre-shot routine time between two skill level professional golfer groups. Conclusion. Based on our findings, the pre-shot routine time of tee shot demonstrate significant influence on performance of professional golfers. A consistent training to maintain the pre-shot routine time of the tee shot will be more effective than those of the second shot and putting. Above all, categorical rumination provide adequate psychological references for both academics and field experts researching golfers’ performance implications.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (53)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-692-001676469