메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The association between Korean workers' presenteeism and psychosocial factors within workplaces
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Yun-Sik Cho (Ajou University Hospital) Jae Bum Park (Ajou University School of Medicine) Kyung-Jong Lee (Ajou University School of Medicine) Kyoung-Bok Min (Seoul National University) Chul-In Baek (Ajou University Hospital)
Journal
The Korean Society Of Occupational And Environment ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE Vol.28 No.9 KCI Accredited Journals SCOPUS
Published
2016.9
Pages
37 - 47 (11page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The association between Korean workers' presenteeism and psychosocial factors within workplaces
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Background: Presenteeism, a concept that has recently undergone active study, is the act of attending work while sick. This study investigates the association between presenteeism and various psychosocial factors within workplaces.
Methods: This study analyzed 29246 wage earners from the third Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS, 2011) data using the logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between presenteeism and various psychosocial factors within workplaces.
Results: Among the 29246 wage earners, 6347 (21.7 %) showed presenteeism. Those who experienced age discrimination at work (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.77: 95 % CI 1.56–2.00), educational background discrimination (aOR 1. 35: 95 % CI 1.22–1.51), regional discrimination (aOR 1.55: 95 % CI 1.31–1.83), sexual discrimination (aOR 1.65: 95 % CI 1. 41–1.94), employment type discrimination (aOR 2.13: 95 % CI 1.89–2.40), physical violence (aOR 1.92: 95 % CI 1.45–2.55), sexual harassment (aOR 2.90: 95 % CI 2.01–4.19), job insecurity (aOR 1.36: 95 % CI 1.18–1.56), work–life imbalance (aOR 1. 38: 95 % CI 1.29–1.47), low job satisfaction (aOR 2.04: 95 % CI 1.91–2.17), no colleague support (aOR 1.11: 95 % CI 1.02–1. 21), job stress (aOR 1.89: 95 % CI 1.76–2.02), emotional labor (aOR 1.50: 95 % CI 1.41–1.60), high work intensity (aOR 1.31: 95 % CI 1.23–1.38), and 3 groups of job strain that are passive group (aOR 1.09: 95 % CI 1.00–1.18), active group (aOR 1. 39: 95 % CI 1.28–1.51), and high strain group (aOR 1.35: 95 % CI 1.24–1.46) showed an increased risk of presenteeism compared to their respective counterparts (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: The study results confirmed the association between presenteeism and various psychosocial factors within workplaces. Considering that presenteeism negatively affects productivity and the mental and physical health of individuals, managing various psychosocial factors within workplaces is proposed to reduce presenteeism.

Contents

Abstract
국문요약
Background
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

References (38)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-517-001364046