지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 178 (178page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, there has been a survey revealing a satisfaction with their public or community facilities in new towns newly built according to life-cycle of residents in 2012. Old people were not satisfied as well as younger residents were not.
Although old people did not satisfied with community facilities provided, there has been no aging-friendly villages initiated in Gyenggi-Do as well as the other cities or counties in Korea have not. Some of old people go to neighborhood centers for the elderly in their villages, others of them go to senior center in towns. The problem is the fact that the rest of them do not go to neighborhood centers for the elderly or senior centers. This problem indicates that senior programs provided through neighborhood centers for the elderly or senior centers are not sufficient. Further, the capacity of senior centers are not expected to hold future old people as well as the current elderly who would like to participate in various programs.
These main problems show that there should be alternatives for providing enough elderly services with future old people forecasted to suddenly increase. In fact, the capacity of senior centers is lagging behind of the number of old people over 65. Other neighborhood centers for the elderly are being evaluated to be questionable in perspective of adequate roles for the elderly services. Considering these problems alternatives for increased old people in future should be formulated. One of alternatives is to create so called aging-friendly villages that residents in villages take care of their seniors as much as possible, letting alone elderly well-fare services from various governments.
The elderly survey shows that 84.4% of survey respondents prefers aging-friendly villages by selecting their houses for aging place to living at silver towns or nursing homes. In process of creating aging-friendly villages, there are many obstacles to overcome such as improving physical or social infrastructure. Further more, there should be self-governing councils or implementation committees for the action for issues, visions, etc on aging-friendly villages. What is more necessary is that governments should initiate the policy for progressing aging-friendly communities.
As challenges for aging-friendly villages, physical facilities must be improved in the current villages as well as social infrastructure, such as providing with more programs for walking, fitness, leisure activities, lifelong learning, meeting old people, sports, dancing, hobby, etc. What is necessary is that governments or public agencies would better support old people villages by dispatching community coordinators to find practical solutions or remove obstacles in process of progressing aging-friendly villages. The other policies are suggested for aging-friendly communities such as home sharing between old people, discounting day for groceries and clothing to the elderly, a joint survey of migrating-in-out, transportation, activities among cities and provinces in Capital Region metropolitan, cooperating among urban planners, welfare services providers for old people, healthy communities, officials responsible for these kinds of duties.
Although old people did not satisfied with community facilities provided, there has been no aging-friendly villages initiated in Gyenggi-Do as well as the other cities or counties in Korea have not. Some of old people go to neighborhood centers for the elderly in their villages, others of them go to senior center in towns. The problem is the fact that the rest of them do not go to neighborhood centers for the elderly or senior centers. This problem indicates that senior programs provided through neighborhood centers for the elderly or senior centers are not sufficient. Further, the capacity of senior centers are not expected to hold future old people as well as the current elderly who would like to participate in various programs.
These main problems show that there should be alternatives for providing enough elderly services with future old people forecasted to suddenly increase. In fact, the capacity of senior centers is lagging behind of the number of old people over 65. Other neighborhood centers for the elderly are being evaluated to be questionable in perspective of adequate roles for the elderly services. Considering these problems alternatives for increased old people in future should be formulated. One of alternatives is to create so called aging-friendly villages that residents in villages take care of their seniors as much as possible, letting alone elderly well-fare services from various governments.
The elderly survey shows that 84.4% of survey respondents prefers aging-friendly villages by selecting their houses for aging place to living at silver towns or nursing homes. In process of creating aging-friendly villages, there are many obstacles to overcome such as improving physical or social infrastructure. Further more, there should be self-governing councils or implementation committees for the action for issues, visions, etc on aging-friendly villages. What is more necessary is that governments should initiate the policy for progressing aging-friendly communities.
As challenges for aging-friendly villages, physical facilities must be improved in the current villages as well as social infrastructure, such as providing with more programs for walking, fitness, leisure activities, lifelong learning, meeting old people, sports, dancing, hobby, etc. What is necessary is that governments or public agencies would better support old people villages by dispatching community coordinators to find practical solutions or remove obstacles in process of progressing aging-friendly villages. The other policies are suggested for aging-friendly communities such as home sharing between old people, discounting day for groceries and clothing to the elderly, a joint survey of migrating-in-out, transportation, activities among cities and provinces in Capital Region metropolitan, cooperating among urban planners, welfare services providers for old people, healthy communities, officials responsible for these kinds of duties.
목차
[표지]
[연구요약]
유관부서와 기관간 협업 추진
가칭「경기도 고령친화점검단」(안) 운영
노인할인요일 도입
수도권 노인Survey 공동조사 진행
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 범위
제3절 연구과제 추진방법
[제2장 고령친화 지역에 관한 선행연구와 동향]
제1절 선행연구 고찰
제2절 고령친화지역 조성동향
제3절 종합
[제3장 고령친화마을 관련시설과 고령자인식]
제1절 고령친화마을 관련시설
제2절 고령친화마을에 대한 고령자인식 설문조사
제3절 종합
[제4장 고령친화형 마을만들기 이슈와 추진방향]
제1절 주요 이슈
제2절 추진방향
제3절 종합
[제5장 결론 및 정책시사점]
제1절 연구결론
제2절 정책시사점
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
마을공동체의식과 지역사회 관계 분석 : 대전광역시 마을만들기 사업을 중심으로
지역사회연구
2015 .12
-
초고령화사회의 노인복지제도의 문제점 및 개선방안
노동법논총
2020 .12
-
경로당의 기능 활성화: 인프라 확대로부터 콘텐츠 확충까지
한국노년학연구
2018 .01
-
Influential Factors on Elderly People’s Subjective Quality of Life
Culinary Science & Hospitality Research
2021 .02
-
A Chronological Review of the Elderly Welfare in Korea
International Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare
2015 .12
-
서울시 빈곤 및 비빈곤 노인의 주관적 건강과 우울감의 관계: 고령친화 보행환경의 조절효과
노인복지연구
2022 .12
-
고령친화시설의 한계 접근 시간 및 거리 분석 – 고령자와 예비고령자의 비교를 중심으로 -
주택도시연구
2024 .12
-
가족정책 관점에서의 가족친화 지역사회 개념화
한국가족복지학
2018 .01
-
고령자 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구: 도·농간 비교 분석
한국지역개발학회지
2019 .09
-
도시의 물리적 · 사회적 환경이 노인의 건강에 미치는 영향 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2015 .06
-
마을공동체미디어 생산자의 미디어 경험에 관한 탐색적 연구 : 제주지역 공동체미디어의 생산과 과제, 정책적 함의를 중심으로
한국언론정보학보
2017 .02
-
중고령자의 고령친화환경 인식 유형과 연령차별에 관한 연구
노인복지연구
2021 .06
-
구리시 노인복지정책 개선방안 연구 : 노인여가복지시설 이용행태를 중심으로
정책연구
2022 .01
-
고령 사회, 인쇄 광고에 나타난 노인의 모습
광고연구
2017 .09
-
근린무질서와 구도심 노인거주환경 만족도의 영향연구 : 장소애착과 사회적 자본을 매개변수로
주택도시연구
2017 .04
-
농촌마을 사회적기업의 지속성 결정요인분석
농업경영.정책연구
2017 .01
-
독일사회 고령자들의 자기 돌봄과 자기 배려
국제학논총
2017 .12
-
고령화 지역의 Aging in Place에 영향을 주는 조건분석을 통한 정책방향 탐색
지역사회연구
2015 .06
-
7개 특·광역시의 고령친화도 변화에 관한 연구: 물리적 환경을 중심으로
도시행정학보
2022 .09
-
시니어 코하우징 입주 노인들의 사회 자본 형성과정에 관한 연구 : 김제시 한울타리 행복의 집을 중심으로
지방정부연구
2017 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
고령친화성을 고려한 마을만들기 활성화 방안
임경수
도시행정학보
2016
.12
고령친화형 마을만들기 : 서울시 종로구 이화동을 중심으로
민현석
,
송지영
,
이현수
외 1명
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2012
.06
노인의 근린생활시설 이용정도와 도보권 시설요구 : 부산지역 거주 노인을 중심으로
오찬옥
한국과학예술융합학회
2015
.06
도시의 물리적 · 사회적 환경이 노인의 건강에 미치는 영향 연구
정유진
,
이세규
한국지역개발학회지
2015
.06
신장 이식 전 또는 후의 PRA(Panel Reactive Antibody)와 이식편 거부 반응과의 관계
이대성
,
이환효
,
이광웅
외 4명
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2003
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-309-001100648