메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
육영수 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2016년 가을호(통권 제116호)
발행연도
2016.8
수록면
277 - 318 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since its initial erection in 1961 the Berlin Wall had represented for a generation a tragic symbol of the Cold-War era and a divided Germany. After its sudden collapse in 1989 in the cortex of a changed international order, the Berlin Wall has experienced a complex afterlife as a historical monument. Within a decade of its fall the wall was virtually on the verge of becoming an endangered historical artifact. This is because the “wall-peckers”, politicians, urban planners and real-estate developers collaborated to erase the sad memories and traumatic scars of the Cold-War era and to reconstruct a new Berlin based on fresh ground. Fortunately, thanks to concern and the support of historians, NGOs, and Berlin city politicians who shared the important value of the wall as an indispensable witness to the Cold War era, the Berlin Wall Memorial opened in 1998 in Bernaurer Street. A reunified German federal government launched the Berlin Wall Foundation and endorsed the General Concept of Commemorating the Berlin Wall in 2008. As a result, the Visitors Center opened in 2009 and the ‘Window of Commemoration’ in 2010.
What factors were standing in the way of making the Berlin Wall a historical monument? Who was credited for stopping the rapid and complete destruction of the wall and transforming its remnants into a public site of memory? What conflicts of interest and ideologies had been intermingled and clashed in the process of the commemoration project and how did they affect the outcome of the Berlin Wall Memorial? This article attempts to answer these questions by rediscovering the wall, not as a trivial byproduct and simple background of the Cold-War era, but as a serious issue of cultural politics with which the reunified Germany has to struggle for the purpose of recreating its new national identity without “the wall persisting in the mind.” In the hope that this study will offer some lessons for the historic-cultural unification of the Korean peninsula, the author concludes that we, instead of perceiving the Berlin Wall as a unique and exclusive German dilemma, should critically “overcome” it in order to embrace a new future and alternative world-view in the age of globalization and trans-nationalism.

목차

1. 그 견고했던 베를린장벽은 어디로 사라졌을까?
2. 베를린장벽의 흥망성쇠
3. 장벽의 부활 혹은 또 다른 생애
4. 누구와 무엇을 위한 기억의 터전인가? : 포스트-장벽시대의 과제와 전망
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-905-000983296