메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
박지선 (연세대학교) 이연숙 (연세대학교) 장미선 (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국실내디자인학회 한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집 한국실내디자인학회 2016년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
발행연도
2016.5
수록면
223 - 226 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Deinstitutionalization from public welfare facility has been cherished for a long time in other to improve the quality of life for the disabled people. However, in reality many housing alternative need to be prepared in older to enable the disabled people live comfortably in their community. Among them the most basic requirement is to provide an appropriately designed house. Unlikely from common residential houses, houses for them are placed among different stakeholders, such as the residents, welfare service providers, care service organizations, fund providers, families, and the local community residents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the plan under the consensus among diverse stakeholders’ views and conflicts. Especially in Korea where supportive housing plan has never been implemented so far. The method used in this study was small group workshop panel method, where participants were potential resident groups (people with disabilities, people without disabilities), administrators of the facilities, social workers and these study team members. In the process of participation, early concept was extracted through two workshops and detailed contents were continuously developed and presented. As a result of this study, specific opinions on the target residents and space plan were delineated. In case of target residents, it was simply classified as a person with disabilities and a university student without disabilities, but later it was subdivided, allowing various housing schemes within the house. Thereby the space was planned separately into independent living and shared living cluster. This study showed the value of participatory planning to pursue a consensus before trial errors otherwise.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구결과
3. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-619-000728861