지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.5
- 수록면
- 177 - 184 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since 1980s, 30 years has passed after issues on environmental refugee began to appear. However, why environmental refugee is not considered as refugee officially in international society? Above all, it seems that main point is the responsibility given to those developed countries if they, whom led the climate changes, officially acknowledge environmental refugee. The problem is that environmental refugee has no direct responsibility for causing climate changes. Actually. the responsibility should be granted to the developed and industrialized countries which caused climate changes.
In accordance to the refugee protection system established under current international law, it is difficult to include them into refugee category and thus, they can hardly have enough support. It is urgently needed that new refugee treat which have the new standard and solution added to it shall be adopted. To allow new refugee treat to be effective it is compulsory to have constant and binding policy determination and willingness of execution from a united international organization. Of course, before this, countries should try to have common recognition on recognizing new refugee problem and its seriousness as well as solving those problems together. In reality, it is worth considering adoption of semi-forceable type of system as a more effective way, which allocates responsibility of accepting refugee by amount of carbon emitted. Also, as refugee issue has an important influence on mother company and the third countries, execution process of the system has to be defined clearly. For those permanent organizations, they should accurately define environmental factors making refugee and set standards to minimize possibility of abuse and misuse.
In accordance to the refugee protection system established under current international law, it is difficult to include them into refugee category and thus, they can hardly have enough support. It is urgently needed that new refugee treat which have the new standard and solution added to it shall be adopted. To allow new refugee treat to be effective it is compulsory to have constant and binding policy determination and willingness of execution from a united international organization. Of course, before this, countries should try to have common recognition on recognizing new refugee problem and its seriousness as well as solving those problems together. In reality, it is worth considering adoption of semi-forceable type of system as a more effective way, which allocates responsibility of accepting refugee by amount of carbon emitted. Also, as refugee issue has an important influence on mother company and the third countries, execution process of the system has to be defined clearly. For those permanent organizations, they should accurately define environmental factors making refugee and set standards to minimize possibility of abuse and misuse.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Concept
Ⅲ. Possibility of accepting concept of environmental refugee in international law
Ⅳ. Conclusion
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
Myers, N and Kent, J, Environmental Exodus: An Emergent Crisis in the Global Arena, Climate Institute, Washington DC, 1995, p.18.
Wonsang Seo, “Human Rights-Based Approach to ‘Environmental Refugees’in International Law”. 『Environmental Law and Policy』, Volume 3 2009,11, p.131.
Jeongwon Park, “International Human Rights – Reality of international human rights and its possibility and limitation”, Jack Donnelly, translated. 1998, p.49-52
Inseop Jeong, 『International Human Rights Treat y』, Kyungin Printing, October 2008, p.55.
D= Universal Declaration of Human rights, E= International Covenant on Economics, Social, and Culture Rights, C= International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Wonsang Seo, “Human Rights-Based Approach to ‘Environmental Refugees’in International Law”. 『Environmental Law and Policy』, Volume 3 2009,11, p.131.
Jeongwon Park, “International Human Rights – Reality of international human rights and its possibility and limitation”, Jack Donnelly, translated. 1998, p.49-52
Inseop Jeong, 『International Human Rights Treat y』, Kyungin Printing, October 2008, p.55.
D= Universal Declaration of Human rights, E= International Covenant on Economics, Social, and Culture Rights, C= International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
탈북민정착지원센터 건축계획에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2019 .10
-
북한이탈주민에 대한 사회적 지지가 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향 : 대처방식의 조절효과를 중심으로
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2016 .03
-
[건축계소식] New Shelters : 난민을 위한 건축적 제안들 외
건축
2016 .07
-
1957년 미아리 난민정착지 도시형태 연구
대한건축학회논문집
2020 .10
-
부산의 한국전쟁 피란민 주거지와 피란주택 특성
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2020 .03
-
북한 이탈 가정과 남한 가정 미취학 아동의 영양장애 발생 비율 비교
보건정보통계학회지
2020 .01
-
난민촌 아동의 안전을 고려한 주거환경 개선방안 고찰
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .04
-
다양한 자연재해를 입은 피난민을 위한 긴급 재난대피소 건설
한국기계가공학회 춘추계학술대회 논문집
2016 .10
-
이재민을 위한 반영구 주거용 막구조 건축에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017 .04
-
미군정기 전재민(戰災民) 주택 연구
대한건축학회논문집
2024 .08
-
북한 인프라 스톡의 실태추적에 의한 기술 및 위험수준 평가
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2016 .03
-
부산 우암동 소막마을, 100년간의 기억
건축
2015 .08
-
[학생기자단 기사] 난민건축 : 사회참여로서의 건축
건축
2016 .10
-
Behavior of the Rescue Robot to Reduce Fire Damage
ITC-CSCC :International Technical Conference on Circuits Systems, Computers and Communications
2015 .06
-
경량 복합패널 구호주거에 대한 횡력저항 성능평가
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2018 .04
-
북한이탈주민의 사회적 관계 모바일 활용이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향 : 사회적자본의 매개효과를 중심으로
디지털콘텐츠학회논문지
2023 .09
-
통일대비 북한 난민 수용을 위한 임시주거시설 공급 방안
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017 .10
-
1970년대 초 부산 용호동 정책이주마을의 주택평면변화 특성
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2015 .05
-
전후 소막사의 구조적 변화에 나타난 주생활사적 가치 : 부산 우암동의 피란민 주거를 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2017 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-004-000735492