지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, we mainly discuss the constraints on translating Chinese resultative “V+de+AP/VP” into Korean(“-ge/dolok” result adverbial), point out that it is mainly restricted by semantic implication between complement(AP/VP) and predicate verb(V), and further explore its cognitive mechanism.
This paper assume that Korean result adverbials more limited than Chinese “V+de+AP/VP” in the choice of result, tends to choose the implicit result in its predicate verb. As for the implicit result, we can divide it into two types: target-result is object-oriented, to be compatible with “-ge” adverbial ending; extend-result is subject-oriented, to be more consistent with “-dolok” adverbial ending. In addition, this paper also investigate which cognitive mechanisms are responsible for the basic order of words in both cases. Chinese resultative “V+de+AP/VP” reflects the actual time sequence, and Korean “(implicit)result adverbials+V” reflects people’s subjective psychological sequence which is the “from easy to difficult” cognitive strategy.
This paper assume that Korean result adverbials more limited than Chinese “V+de+AP/VP” in the choice of result, tends to choose the implicit result in its predicate verb. As for the implicit result, we can divide it into two types: target-result is object-oriented, to be compatible with “-ge” adverbial ending; extend-result is subject-oriented, to be more consistent with “-dolok” adverbial ending. In addition, this paper also investigate which cognitive mechanisms are responsible for the basic order of words in both cases. Chinese resultative “V+de+AP/VP” reflects the actual time sequence, and Korean “(implicit)result adverbials+V” reflects people’s subjective psychological sequence which is the “from easy to difficult” cognitive strategy.
목차
1. 引言
2. 結果的規約性程度在漢韓結構對應的制約作用
3. 兩種規約性結果與韓語副詞語語尾“-게” 和“-도록”
4. 決定對應結構的認知理據
5. 結語
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Split Analysis of Korean Transitive Resultative Constructions
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
形容词的动态性与现代汉语VA动结式的能产性
중국언어연구
2024 .02
-
A Clausal Analysis of Resultative Constructions with X-key: Evidence from Corpus and Experiments
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
러시아어 작문･번역 교육을 위한 러시아어-한국어 결과 구문 비교 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2016 .01
-
한국어 상 체계와 결과상의 유형 - 2차 상태의 내적 국면을 나타내는 비완망상 -
언어와 정보사회
2016 .11
-
영어의 결과구문 특성과 한국인의 이해도
영어교과교육
2016 .01
-
An Experimental Study of Resultative Constructions with X-key
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
Korean Resultative Construction Redux
언어연구
2022 .08
-
On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
Korean Speakers' Sensitivity to Aspectual Shift in Resultatives with Derived Accomplishments in English*
영어학연구
2016 .01
-
Judgement of Telicity in English Resultative Constructions by Korean Learners of English
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in Korean
어학연구
2018 .08
-
A Usage-based Analysis of L2 Production of English Resultative Constructions
어학연구
2019 .04
-
Three Types of the Intransitive Resultative Construction in English: A Generative Account
영어학
2023 .01
-
On English Verbal Anaphor: VP Replacement and VP Ellipsis
현대문법연구
2017 .01
-
VP-fronting, VP-ellipsis, VP-anaphora and Phases
영어학
2015 .09
-
The Syntactic Status of Resultatives and the Direct Object Restriction
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
A Corpus-based Comparison of the Use of English Resultative Constructions between Chinese English Learners and Native English Speakers
영어교육연구
2021 .09
-
L2 영어 학습자의 결과구문 생성의 용법기반 분석(Usage-based Analysis): 한국인 예비대학생 작문 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-820-002316862